On 09/02/2012 23:42, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
>
> Just to confirm - 7.0.25 seems to solve the problem for the most part.
"Most part"? So there is still a leak?
p
> /Janne
>
> On 24 Jan 2012, at 10:53, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
>
>>
>> Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak
Just to confirm - 7.0.25 seems to solve the problem for the most part.
/Janne
On 24 Jan 2012, at 10:53, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
>
> Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at
> least mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by
> Tomcat, but th
Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at least
mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by Tomcat, but
this is less than what 7.0.23/.22 was doing. I will continue to run this a bit
further and report back in a day or two whether the situatio
The change log for Tomcat 7.0.25 contains this entry:
"Correct error in fix for 49683. (markt)"
Is this bug fix expected to fix the file descriptor leak that was
reported in Tomcat 7.0.23?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
