mod_jk + SSL

2007-04-07 Thread Cameron
I haven't really found any documentation on getting mod_jk to work together. I have managed to get my apache server to provide an https connection to my tomcat's server regular HTTP 8080. Is this the correct way to do it? Or can I connect to my tomcat server on port 8443? I can live with this

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-09 Thread Martin Gainty
distribuer ou de le reproduire. - Original Message - From: dfelicia [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:07 PM Subject: Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3 Tomcat currently does not support encryption. Huh? Sure it does. I think you mean

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-08 Thread fredk2
Hi, although I have not tested this personally, but I was told that mod_proxy (_ajp) does not have the Auto Flush option that you can set with mod_jk and thus creates problem for streaming applications. I wonder if others came accross this problem ? Rgds - Fred Hassan Schroeder-2 wrote:

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-08 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On 12/8/06, fredk2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: although I have not tested this personally, but I was told that mod_proxy (_ajp) does not have the Auto Flush option that you can set with mod_jk and thus creates problem for streaming applications. You might want to look at the flushpackets

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-08 Thread fredk2
ooops - I need to spend more time reading the fine manual :-) tx for the reminder :) Hassan Schroeder-2 wrote: On 12/8/06, fredk2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: although I have not tested this personally, but I was told that mod_proxy (_ajp) does not have the Auto Flush option that you can

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-08 Thread dfelicia
Not true; see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html Interesting. I'll need to look into mod_proxy, further. But what about performance? I've not tested it in a long while, but last I tried it was slower that mod_jk. BTW, does Apache 2.2's new mod_proxy_ajp support

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-08 Thread dfelicia
Tomcat currently does not support encryption. Huh? Sure it does. I think you mean AJP doesn't support encryption. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-this-possibe---mod_jk-%3C%3D%3DSSL%3D%3D%3E-AJP-1.3-tf2776640.html#a7769280 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list

Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-07 Thread dfelicia
Can traffic between mod_jk and Tomcat's AJP connector be encrypted (without using ssh/stunnel)? I see SSL mentioned in the doc for AJP, but it's clear as mud: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/ajp.html So, in Apache, I am using SSL and mod_jk. I set these parameters per the

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-07 Thread Martin Gainty
Subject: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3 Can traffic between mod_jk and Tomcat's AJP connector be encrypted (without using ssh/stunnel)? I see SSL mentioned in the doc for AJP, but it's clear as mud: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/ajp.html So, in Apache, I am

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-07 Thread fredk2
PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 2:46 PM Subject: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3 Can traffic between mod_jk and Tomcat's AJP connector be encrypted (without using ssh/stunnel)? I see SSL mentioned in the doc for AJP, but it's clear

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-07 Thread dfelicia
As far as have seen there is no SSL support for AJP/1.3 - the trafic is in clear between the Apache and tomcat using mod_jk. I guess with apache 2 you can use mod_proxy and ssl to a tomcat using the http connector with ssl. Thanks for the reply, Fred. I feared that was the answer. The problem

Re: Is this possibe? mod_jk ==SSL== AJP/1.3

2006-12-07 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On 12/7/06, dfelicia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mod_proxy is ... It also doesn't offer load-balancing, Not true; see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html I've used this recently (with mod_proxy_ajp) and it worked fine. :-) FWIW, -- Hassan Schroeder