Mladen Turk wrote:
Scott Danforth wrote:
I'm trying to use jk1.2.20 mod_jk with Apache 1.3 for load balancing
two tomcat services and sticky sessions aren't working.
You don't have session affinity mark
For each instance add jvmRoute="tomcat1" or
jvmRoute="tomcat2 for a second instance. See
P.S. I see a mention of "cluster" in the documentation for jvmRoute. Do
I need to configure a "cluster" perhaps?
-- Scott.
Scott Danforth wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Scott Danforth wrote:
I'm trying to use jk1.2.20 mod_jk with Apache 1.3 for load balancing
two tomcat services and sticky
Scott Danforth wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Thanks for your help. That sounds very reasonable, and I modifed the two
server.xml Engine elements as suggested, but it appears to make no
difference.
get_most_suitable_worker::jk_lb_worker.c (733): searching worker for
partial sessionid 9E36E3DC58
Hi Mladen,
I really appreciate your help, and am happy that you're seeing a problem
in the log output.
I think I've got the Engine attributes specified correctly, and the two
different jvmRoute values do show up in the mod_jk log.
jvmRoute="tomcat1" />
jvmRoute="tomcat2" />
Maybe if I g
sticky session still not working
P.S. I see a mention of "cluster" in the documentation for jvmRoute. Do
I need to configure a "cluster" perhaps?
-- Scott.
Scott Danforth wrote:
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> Scott Danforth wrote:
>>
>>> I'm tr
-Original Message-
From: Scott Danforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 February 2007 15:04
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk sticky session still not working
P.S. I see a mention of "cluster" in the documentation for jvmRoute. Do
I need to configure a "cluster" p
