JacksonJaxbJsonProvider - no @Path on deployment

2013-02-22 Thread James Green
Hi, I have an application with a JAX-RS activation class thus: @javax.ws.rs.ApplicationPath(/api) public class Activator extends javax.ws.rs.core.Application { @Override public SetClass? getClasses() { SetClass? s = new HashSetClass?(); [ ... ] return s; }

Re: JacksonJaxbJsonProvider - no @Path on deployment

2013-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
I think it works on the snapshot Le 22 févr. 2013 13:17, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi, I have an application with a JAX-RS activation class thus: @javax.ws.rs.ApplicationPath(/api) public class Activator extends javax.ws.rs.core.Application { @Override public

Re: JacksonJaxbJsonProvider - no @Path on deployment

2013-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
1.6.0 Le 22 févr. 2013 13:25, James Green james.mk.gr...@gmail.com a écrit : https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/openejb/apache-tomee/ Should I be looking at 1.5.2 or 1.6.0? On 22 February 2013 12:22, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Support different persistence providers for different applications

2013-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi, good need: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-779 *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github:

Re: Support different persistence providers for different applications

2013-02-22 Thread James Green
On a similar note, why must an app specify in persistence.xml which JPA provider to use? It doesn't specify which JAX-RS provider to use... On 22 February 2013 13:47, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, good need: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-779 *Romain

Re: Support different persistence providers for different applications

2013-02-22 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
there is no link to datasource(s) at all with this feature the need to force is mainly to keep backward compatibility *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: