can you reproduce it in a junit?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/6/10
Hi,
which version? did you put a beans.xml in META-INF of the jar?
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github:
We run 1.5.1 release.
We have beans.xml located in webapp/myapp/WEB-INF/beans.xml.
Do we have to put beans.xml in META-INF of the distributed jar file? What
should we put there?
--
View this message in context:
should be fine on current trunk
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/6/10
yes put an empty beans.xml in META-INF in your archive
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github:
Unfortunately this didn't help
Is there any way how to put TomEE into a verbose mode to check why that bean
is not visible?
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Construct-EJB-from-a-separate-JAR-file-tp4663583p4663589.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing
So, where is LoggerBuilder defined? same JAR or a different JAR?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:15 AM, zeddius avalyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately this didn't help
Is there any way how to put TomEE into a verbose mode to check why that
bean
is not visible?
--
View this message in
/LoggerBuilder /is defined in the same jar as /LoggingInterceptor/. And we
put this jar in our application WEB-INF/lib dir. It seems that
/LoggingInterceptor /is visible because we declare it in beans.xml which is
located in WEB-INF.
--
View this message in context:
Can you share a sample showing it on github?
Le 10 juin 2013 18:54, CThorburn cthorbu...@gmail.com a écrit :
Nope, no sign of it under 1.6 either. NB it's simply a subclass of
org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader with the constructors and
get/findResource(s) overridden to do a
Jose,
Interesting. I think i have plenty of (CDI) managed beans with public
attributes, which are referenced by xhtml files and .java classes in my web
app (WAR), but I don't have CODI dependency.
What versions of CODI and TomEE are you using?
Howard
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM, José Luis
CODI 1.5 and TomEE 1.6.0-Snapshot.
:)
El 10/06/2013 16:28, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
escribió:
Interesting.
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: no
org.apache.myfaces.extensions.cdi.core.api.provider.BeanManagerProvider
in place!
Please ensure that you configured
Latest TomEE 1.6.0-snapshot (trunk) ?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:50 PM, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.comwrote:
CODI 1.5 and TomEE 1.6.0-Snapshot.
:)
El 10/06/2013 16:28, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
escribió:
Interesting.
Caused by:
Yes. Maven download always the lastest snapshot.
El 10/06/2013 19:54, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
escribió:
Latest TomEE 1.6.0-snapshot (trunk) ?
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:50 PM, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.com
wrote:
CODI 1.5 and TomEE 1.6.0-Snapshot.
:)
El
Hi
Didnt you put some part of your app in tomee/lib?
Le 11 juin 2013 02:58, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.com a écrit :
Yes. Maven download always the lastest snapshot.
El 10/06/2013 19:54, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com
escribió:
Latest TomEE 1.6.0-snapshot (trunk) ?
Hmm, is it still a cdi bean then? I mean isnt there anything preventing it
to be proxied or anything in the idea preventing it to be a cdi bean?
Le 11 juin 2013 06:49, José Luis Cetina maxtorz...@gmail.com a écrit :
Nop. If i just mark the fields as private the error goes away.
El 10/06/2013
15 matches
Mail list logo