After some time of vacation, today is my first day, and I have upgraded to
Apache TomEE 1.7.0 and I have tried the same example. Now the archive is
deployed correctly to remote server but the test execution does not
"inject" the EJB.
In remote apache tomee I can see this log message:
Sep 01, 2014
@RunWith(Arquillian.class)
public class TheTest {
@Deployment
public static JavaArchive deployment() {
return ShrinkWrap.create(JavaArchive.class).addClass(HelloEJB.class);
}
@EJB
private HelloEJB helloWorldEjb;
@Test
public void testHelloWorld() {
System.out.println("");
System.out.println("");
Are you using embed adpater? In my case in embed adapter works as well but
not in remote (when I say remote is a remote as Arquillian defines an
already started TomEE instance in remote host).
2014-09-01 10:11 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> @RunWith(Arquillian.class)
> public class TheTest {
>
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd";>
4.0.0
orgtest
foo
1.0-SNAPSHOT
org.apache.op
Well TomEE server is already running in remote host. My arquillian.xml conf
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns="http://jboss.org/schema/arquillian";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://jboss.org/schema/arquillian
http://www.jboss.org/schema/arquillian/arquillian_1_0.xsd";>
Hi
I have some questions on EJBs and concurrency, I hope someone can shed some
light on the following questions:
1. I have understood that the annotations @ConcurrencyManagement and @Lock
only are applicable to Singelton EJBs and that the default values are
container managed concurrency and WRITE
in such cases we don't add our enricher to not modify the started
instance I guess, so you surely need to add arquillian enrichers (but
you can then do a bit less than us)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannib
when you say adding Arquillian enrichers you mean the arquillian dependency
right? Ok thank you. But my question is what is the reason on why to do
this when for example Glassfish and Wildlfy does not require it?
2014-09-01 10:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> in such cases we don't add our e
Hi,
I have a setup where persistent messages are posted to a Topic. On this
topic I have multiple durable subscribers, each with a different message
selector. When I am pushing messages to this topic, I am noticing that they
are not being deleted after consumption. I tried pushing a hundred message
Hi
1. true
2. @ConcurrencyManagement(BEAN -> lock free, @Lock(READ)
reentrantLock.readLock().lock/unlock is called (performance wise
difference is not that important in general)
3. it should. comparison is fair
4. @TransactionAttribute defines the transactional context you want,
required will crea
glassfish and wildfly needs enrichers as well. Maybe they provide them
as dependency to their adapter (didnt check). We don't rely on them by
default since we have a better enrichment system but for existing
tomee we don't want to modify them so we don't add it
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmanni
Do you know from memory the jar where arquillian enrichers are provided?
2014-09-01 11:47 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> glassfish and wildfly needs enrichers as well. Maybe they provide them
> as dependency to their adapter (didnt check). We don't rely on them by
> default since we have a bet
our own ones or arquillian ones?
arquillian: org.jboss.arquillian.testenricher/arquillian-testenricher-ejb
our own is created dynamically
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/r
@Romain
Thanks for the answers... in question 4 I meant that if I annotate a bean
with @TransactionAttribute will it still work as expected regardless of if
the bean instance is accessed with multiple threads at the same time or
not (in the case of singleton read lock or singleton bean concurrenc
I have added
@Deployment
public static JavaArchive deployment() {
JavaArchive[] asFile =
Maven.resolver().loadPomFromFile("pom.xml").resolve("org.jboss.arquillian.testenricher:arquillian-testenricher-ejb").withTransitivity().as(JavaArchive.class);
JavaArchive javaArchive =
ShrinkWrap.create(JavaAr
Hmm
I think it needs to be added as dependency but then keep in mind
arquillian is buggy with not war packaging (works often with ear,
almost never with jar)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: h
transactions are mainly a thread local things so it is safe and has no
link with concurrency.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 12:15 GMT+02:00 Lars-F
Hi all. it is possible declare a datasource with resources.xml into
META-INF/resoures.xml for get the entity and the persistence all inside a
ejb.jar ???
It work ??
So i not have to declare the datasource int oweb application .
Nexdt the web application call the ejb deployed int othe ejb.ja
@Romain thanks for all answers...
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> transactions are mainly a thread local things so it is safe and has no
> link with concurrency.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: ht
With WebArchive does not work. It seems a bit complicated hehehehe but this
mode I think it may be required soon by community because briefly you will
be able to run tests using Arquillian against Docker by using remote
adapter. With wildfly it works and now I am trying to use it with TomEE.
2014
well if you add enricher and call you archive test as arquillian
expects it works
not sure about required thing since I think for integration tests it
is good to have throwable away containers (our default behavior). Why
would you rely on a custom setup of a container when you don't need
it?
Rom
you can in resources.xml but in the deployment you use, if that's a
war then in WEB-INF, if it is just a jar then META-INF is fine
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibuca
Not for integration but for functional tests, regression tests, deployment
tests, .for this reason I would like to see if it works with TomEE. But
I can't run it yet :( Of course it works using Maven but I would like to
have it with Arquillian as well.
2014-09-01 15:37 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-
well that's out of arquillian scope then, just pure selenium tests
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 15:40 GMT+02:00 Alex Soto :
> Not for integration
Well but you can use Arquillian Drone to make your life easier and to only
deploy the part under test (regression tests or security tests for
example). Well this is something that Karl has been working on and also in
my company is planned to be used, and for this reason I was researching if
it was
at work we use an uber jar with plain selenim (maven is forbidden in prod).
That said if you setup arquillian correctly it works :) - that's not a
tomee issue said otherwise
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmann
Yes sure, but I don't know why I cannot make it run. I send to Arquillian
a WebArchive with enricher jars appended as well but enrichment doesn't
occurs.
2014-09-01 15:46 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> at work we use an uber jar with plain selenim (maven is forbidden in prod).
>
> That said i
Hi,
I'm sorry that I'm revitalizing this thread, but I' like to discuss a thing
or two regarding (DS) and mocking.
Scenario:
Running IT tests using embedded and @classrules.
testfile:
@PropertyFile("test-lab.properties")
public class MockIT {
}
In test-lab.properties I can define project stage,
think it doesnt need to be in the jar since arquillian enricher
extension does it:
http://grepcode.com/file/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.jboss.arquillian.testenricher/arquillian-testenricher-ejb/1.1.4.Final/org/jboss/arquillian/testenricher/ejb/client/EJBEnricherArchiveAppender.java#EJBEnricherArchi
Hi Romain
A follow up question. What will the difference between a @Singleton EJB and
a @Statefull @ApplicationScoped EJB be? Is it only the fact that the latter
will have a CDI-proxy in fron of the EJB-proxy but function wise they will
work the same?
Regards
Lars-Fredrik
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 a
stateful appscoped = @singleton @lock(write)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 16:27 GMT+02:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg :
> Hi Romain
>
> A follow up que
So basically if I instead use @Singleton I have the possibility to use bean
managed concurrency as well as @Lock(READ)... ?
Regards
Lars-Fredrik
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> stateful appscoped = @singleton @lock(write)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannib
yep
stateful scope is bound to client scope, having an appscoped stateful
is quite weird from my point of view ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 1
agree... seems weird
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> yep
>
> stateful scope is bound to client scope, having an appscoped stateful
> is quite weird from my point of view ;)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> L
I'm randomly getting NullPointerExceptions in my production environment
(stack trace below); most of the time the code is working, yet time-to-time
I'm getting the NullPointerException.
That is how ELResolverProducer.getELResolver(ELResolverProducer.java:53)
looks like:
It seems that producer m
Hi
can you check the classloader you have when rewrite is called?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 18:33 GMT+02:00 DonatasCiuksys :
> I'm randomly g
so if i deploy a EAR application with inside a module ejb jar and a module
war for the view, so it is legal put resources.xml into META-INF of jar of
ejb ? and so i not put resources.xml into WEB-INF of war?
2014-09-01 15:39 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau [via TomEE & OpenEJB] <
ml-node+s979440n46
Hmm good question, I have to admit I never tried but sounds
reasonable, if not maybe META-INF or the ear
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 18:38 GMT+0
i not know. If some have experience with this question let me know.
2014-09-01 18:50 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau [via TomEE & OpenEJB] <
ml-node+s979440n4671532...@n4.nabble.com>:
> Hmm good question, I have to admit I never tried but sounds
> reasonable, if not maybe META-INF or the ear
>
>
>
I made a breakpoint, and during debug both this.getClass().getClassLoader()
and Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader() return this (yet in this
case beanManager was not null):
org.apache.tomee.catalina.LazyStopWebappClassLoader
context: /tar
delegate: false
repositories:
/WEB-INF
are you able to try to reproduce it? can maybe be linked to context
(jaxrs, jaxws...)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-09-01 19:00 GMT+02:00 DonatasCiuksys
Hi,
On Tomcat 7 I used to set JVM arguments with the setenv.sh file.
Is this the best approach for TomEE?
Thanks
You can do the same for TomEE, you just need to touch a file and edit it.
Andy.
On 01/09/2014 22:26, Felipe Jaekel wrote:
Hi,
On Tomcat 7 I used to set JVM arguments with the setenv.sh file.
Is this the best approach for TomEE?
Thanks
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
See the comments in the catalina.sh for more info.
Andy.
On 01/09/2014 22:26, Felipe Jaekel wrote:
Hi,
On Tomcat 7 I used to set JVM arguments with the setenv.sh file.
Is this the best approach for TomEE?
Thanks
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.c
Hi
For tomcat/boot system props yes, for others conf/system.properties is nice
cause more readable and portable whatever you run on windows, unix, in an
IDE or with maven plugin
Le 1 sept. 2014 23:19, "Andy Gumbrecht" a écrit :
> See the comments in the catalina.sh for more info.
>
> Andy.
>
> O
45 matches
Mail list logo
