Agree, a test needs something to test. Maybe we should change the message
to add a hint?
Andy.
On 28 May 2015 at 14:25, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Well it is the way it is done. If nothing to deploy it fails.
Forcing the MODULES it should work
Le 28 mai 2015 01:58, Alex
+1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Alex Soto asot...@gmail.com wrote:
Short answer, I think so in fact it is almost there because lot of TomEE
API has already migrated.
Real answer, any hand is more than
Hi
THIS IS NOT A BUG (joke apart try to not write in uppercase;))
this is a bug in netbeans, just rename tomee-common-x.x.x.jar to
tomee-common-1.6.0.jar and it should work. Anycase it should go on netbeans
bugtracker.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
2015-05-29 0:31 GMT-04:00 JESUS GEIDER GUERRA HERNANDEZ
jgguer...@misena.edu.co:
I create a Session Beans For Entity Classess, the message show up this:
Cannot be generated for Java EE 6 sources without server with complete
Java EE 6 Web Profile support (at least EJB Lite support).
I see
Hi, I actually studyign programing, so, I have some excersices for
creating JSF web and including connection to database, the bug appears when
I create a Session Beans For Entity Classess, the message show up this:
Cannot be generated for Java EE 6 sources without server with complete
Java EE
Do you have a sample to reproduce ?
Le 29 mai 2015 12:23, JESUS GEIDER GUERRA HERNANDEZ
jgguer...@misena.edu.co a écrit :
Hi, I actually studyign programing, so, I have some excersices for
creating JSF web and including connection to database, the bug appears when
I create a Session Beans
I have some suggestions, I will send you an email privately.
Alex.
El dv., 29 maig 2015 a les 11:06, Jean-Louis Monteiro (
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com) va escriure:
+1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Alex
Hi,
yep, should be org.apache.openjpa:openjpa:2.4.0 + the openejb-javaagent
should be in place, also assume you use -ea option.
Thanks for the response.
I've set the JAVA_OPTS as follows in my server startup script and put the
javaagent jar in the mentioned position. But I'm still getting the
@Romain
If the long running task (started as an @Asynchronous EJB method) is
periodacally sleeping for say 1 minute and then perform some tasks and goes
to sleep again
Would it then be okay to on the EJB class level have a: private volatile
Therad asynchronousThread; variable...
The
2015-05-29 14:55 GMT+02:00 Lars-Fredrik Smedberg itsme...@gmail.com:
@Romain
If the long running task (started as an @Asynchronous EJB method) is
periodacally sleeping for say 1 minute and then perform some tasks and goes
to sleep again
Would it then be okay to on the EJB class level
@Romain
Thanks for the answer
I use a boolean now... the problem (if any) is that using a boolean flag is
that the shutdown will take atleast the time the wait interval is
Did you then mean I need to in the @PreDestroy wait for the async thread to
finish and exit?
About the thread and
@Romain
Got it... so do i need in @PreDestroy method to wait for the async method
to pick up the boolean variable change and exit before exiting @PreDestroy
method or will application shutdown wait a certain amount of time for async
method executions to finish?
On May 29, 2015 3:40 PM, Romain
yep, a CountDownLatch is perfect for it
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
2015-05-29 15:45
On May 29, 2015 3:48 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
yep, a CountDownLatch is perfect for it
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github
https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn
https://tomee.apache.org/comparison.html
This page references images off site and behind an ASF protected
authentication. It seems it would just be easier to put an 'x' mark
instead and avoid these SSL issues. Also, the firefox is complaining
about this page's SSL certificate.
it depends also on your config but if you have another task finishing after
(singleton) which starts an asynch task as well here you can force your
pool to recreate thread. Then add a custom pool config and you are lost
about what will happen ;)
the point point is to handle the level you use (you
@Romain
Just tried it out in a testcase... boolean for stopping and countdownlatch
for waiting in the predestroy method until the async method has ended is
working good...
Thanks for the hints...
However I still little curious when you wrote:
You dont have by default one thread by task but a
17 matches
Mail list logo
