Re: -D host on EAR file

It works with application.xml Thanks. 2016-12-08 15:00 GMT-06:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > assuming it is > > options I see - I probably miss a few but it is late ;): > > - rename the .war in the ear > - map the context in application.xml explicitely > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

Re: -D host on EAR file

assuming it is options I see - I probably miss a few but it is late ;): - rename the .war in the ear - map the context in application.xml explicitely Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

Re: -D host on EAR file

Yeap, you are right, the host is OK, but the path is taken from the maven module name instead of the context.xml Any suggestion? 2016-12-08 14:56 GMT-06:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > oh i get the issue now but this is unrelated to the host then, the context > name changed but host seems ok, right?

Re: -D host on EAR file

oh i get the issue now but this is unrelated to the host then, the context name changed but host seems ok, right? think tomcat doesnt allow to use the context.xml to change the path, can it be it - still not 100% sure I fully got your case? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: -D host on EAR file

Hi Romain. Look this please (log files): *TomEE 1.7.4 JAX RS* TomEE INFO: - localhost-rhino.com -> /rhino *TomEE 7.0 plus* INFO [http-nio-8080-exec-4] org.apache.tomee.catalina.TomcatWebAppBuilder.init - localhost-rhino.com -> /kx-apps-rhino As y

Re: -D host on EAR file

Hi José, it is not supposed to have changed Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

-D host on EAR file

Hi, i was using TomEE 1.7.4 in my ear project. In this project i have 2 war files, each war file is accessed by their own HOST. I have this in my VM options: -D.host=localhost-myhost1.com Then in my context.xml file i have: Then i could access to my webapp using: localhost-myhost1.com/mypath

Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ?

this case was not impacted by the fix but you can set to false openejb.cxf.rs.bval.active Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | Link

RE: Performance issue with Bean validation ?

Hello, Of course it will be linked to the validation complexity (for example validation with a reg exp will be slower, I guess, than a not null validation) but I want to compare the time for a rest call with bean validation and without any bean validation and measure the ratio. This is why I ha

Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ?

you mean removed? on the reported cases it was seconds so very visible. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

RE: Performance issue with Bean validation ?

Hello, Any idea about the overhead introduced : 2%, 10%, 20% ? Best Regards. -Original Message- From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com] Sent: mercredi 7 décembre 2016 09:02 To: users@tomee.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance issue with Bean validation ? yes Romain Mann