Oh I see... maybe something inside the dao wasn't initialized/injected?
[]s,
Thiago.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Matej gma...@gmail.com wrote:
UniversalConfigurationDao is a Stateless Bean.
BRM
2015-03-10 10:51 GMT+01:00 Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org:
Hi,
Adding
Hi,
Adding @DependsOn(UniversalConfigurationDao) in your singleton bean does
not fix the problem?
@Singleton
@Startup
@ConcurrencyManagement(ConcurrencyManagementType.BEAN)
@DependsOn(UniversalConfigurationDao)
public class UniversalConfigurationService {
@Inject
Write a singleton MdbDelegate which has a onMessage methid and your mdb get
MdbDelegate injected and mdb onMessage calls delegate.onMessage.
This way you get depends on working.
Le 10 mars 2015 11:55, Thiago Veronezi thi...@veronezi.org a écrit :
Oh I see... maybe something inside the dao
Hi Romain.
I don't really understand your solution. Can you please provide me with
simple exmaple So I'll understand.
BR
MAtej
2015-03-09 22:59 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Why not using a dependson singleton as delegate in your mdb as mentionned?
Fast and
Would something like that help. That's probably something what David meant.
@Singleton
@Startup
@Lock(LockType.READ)
@ConcurrencyManagement(ConcurrencyManagementType.CONTAINER)
public class UniversalConfigurationService {
@Inject
UniversalConfigurationDao configDao;
private
Why not using a dependson singleton as delegate in your mdb as mentionned?
Fast and reliable as fix imo
Le 9 mars 2015 22:13, Matej gma...@gmail.com a écrit :
Would something like that help. That's probably something what David meant.
@Singleton
@Startup
@Lock(LockType.READ)
Hi Romain. Yes we have also @Startup annoatation.
BR
MAtej
2015-03-07 13:57 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi
Concurrency should be fine. Is singleton @Startup?
Le 7 mars 2015 12:53, Matej gma...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi everybody.
We have an annoying problem on
Hi
Concurrency should be fine. Is singleton @Startup?
Le 7 mars 2015 12:53, Matej gma...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi everybody.
We have an annoying problem on our production system. We have an
Configuration Singleton which reads config things from DB. Then in one MDB
we inject this Singleton to
Hi everybody.
We have an annoying problem on our production system. We have an
Configuration Singleton which reads config things from DB. Then in one MDB
we inject this Singleton to control operation based on configs. Our problem
is that the system is quite heavely loadded and while the system
You should be able to delegate to another singleton in your mdb. Dependson
would work then
Le 7 mars 2015 20:31, Matej gma...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi Romain. Yes we have also @Startup annoatation.
BR
MAtej
2015-03-07 13:57 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
Hi
The @DependsOn annotation only works for other @Singleton beans.
Definitely use CONTAINER concurrency. Understand that this code is just a
plain jvm ReentrantReadWriteLock under the covers. It would be hard to do much
better.
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
