why dont you create your own converter for now and see how that
improves things. we are talking about something that took 1.4 seconds
out of at least a 100+ second test...
-igor
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
>> im not sure how necessary the threadlocal is. yes, it took u
> im not sure how necessary the threadlocal is. yes, it took up 6mb of
> memory, but those instances are not being held on to, so if you run GC
> all that memory will be reclaimed.
I am more concerned with the cpu hog than the memory hog associated
with the converter.
**
Martin
>
> On Sun, Feb 8
> no, but it should take out that Task$1 which is the biggest cpu hog.
Well, that is just the server pool thread... it is not relevant.
**
Martin
>
> -igor
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Martin Makundi
> wrote:
>>> are you load testing wicket in development mode?
>>
>> Ofcourse ;)
>>
>> I
im not sure how necessary the threadlocal is. yes, it took up 6mb of
memory, but those instances are not being held on to, so if you run GC
all that memory will be reclaimed.
-igor
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
> Cool. What is your take on using a ThreaLocal instead of al
no, but it should take out that Task$1 which is the biggest cpu hog.
-igor
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
>> are you load testing wicket in development mode?
>
> Ofcourse ;)
>
> I run the tests again in deployment mode, does not affect the
> BigDecimalConverter results.
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:06 AM, cpopetz wrote:
> > This works great when running in-container, but isn't playing well with
> > tests that use ajax. When an ajax link is clicked in-container, the full
> > request cycle is step()ed through. But BaseWicketTester.clickLink(), which
> > I presume i
> are you load testing wicket in development mode?
Ofcourse ;)
I run the tests again in deployment mode, does not affect the
BigDecimalConverter results.
**
Martin
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Martin Makundi
> wrote:
>>> that means you can create about 3500/second...how many users do yo
Cool. What is your take on using a ThreaLocal instead of always
cloning return (NumberFormat)numberFormat.clone(); in
org.apache.wicket.util.convert.converters.AbstractDecimalConverter#getNumberFormat(java.util.Locale)
**
Martin
2009/2/9 Igor Vaynberg :
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Martin Ma
the problem is wicket tester doesnt run wicket through the entire
web-request workflow and you are hooking into a part that is not being
hit. i have a good idea of where to add an extension point, please
open a jira issue so i can attach a patch there and you can see if it
will work for you.
-igor
are you load testing wicket in development mode?
-igor
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
>> that means you can create about 3500/second...how many users do you
>> have on that server?
>
> It's just a load test. It's a heavyish page on itself and I am hitting
> it with about 2
> that means you can create about 3500/second...how many users do you
> have on that server?
It's just a load test. It's a heavyish page on itself and I am hitting
it with about 20 concurrent users.
> btw, your memory profile attachment didnt make it through,
> maybe you can upload your images so
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
> Another thing that came into my mind is, that there is
> newNumberFormat(Locale locale) -method in AbstractDecimalConverter,
> but the method is never used [instead, there is a direct "numberFormat
> = NumberFormat.getInstance(locale);" -invo
that means you can create about 3500/second...how many users do you
have on that server? can you show us the timing screenshot, i am very
curious. btw, your memory profile attachment didnt make it through,
maybe you can upload your images somewhere else.
-igor
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Mart
Micro -> multiplied under load so the cost accumulates. And here
attached is a picture of the memory profile, I am not sure if I read
this right, but it says 6-8 Mb.
**
Martin
2009/2/9 Igor Vaynberg :
> is that 291 milliseconds or 291 microseconds?
>
> -igor
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Ma
is that 291 milliseconds or 291 microseconds?
-igor
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
> I remembered it was a hotspot. Checking again, it is not a memory
> bottleneck but a performance bottleneck. I apologise for my
> imprecision.
>
> I have several BigDecimalLabels each with
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Erick Fleming wrote:
> private final org.apache.wicket.markup.repeater.data.IDataProvider
> org.apache.wicket.markup.repeater.data.DataViewBase.dataProvider
> [class=$Proxy5]
> protected java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler
> java.lang.reflect.Proxy.h [class=or
I remembered it was a hotspot. Checking again, it is not a memory
bottleneck but a performance bottleneck. I apologise for my
imprecision.
I have several BigDecimalLabels each with its own converter. Each
instance creation takes 291 us on the reference computer. Furthermore,
each of the getNumberF
I tried it in my app (running 1.4-rc1) and was not able to reproduce this.
Phil
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Arthur Leigh Allen <
arthurleigh.al...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> hi igor, it's 1.3.5
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: Igor Vaynberg
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Gesendet:
hi
Just a question, about this suggestion :
normal html or wicket
componentsnormal html or wicket components
Is it completely far off or could it be interesting ? What do you think of
it ?
thanks in advance
++
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-a-component-in
Timo, Thanks alot for the feedback.
I'm getting close, but am running into a serialization problem with the
mocked IDataProvider (JMock and Mockito).
2 [class=org.apache.wicket.util.tester.DummyPanelPage, path=2]
private java.lang.Object org.apache.wicket.MarkupContainer.children
[class=or
What in particular was hogging that 200MB of memory? Was your converter
holding something? If it were just a simple converter class like most, it
would take thousands upon thousands of them to take that much memory. Most
likely, you have another issue. Run a profiler and let us know what's usin
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Martin Makundi wrote:
> Exactly. I had a component with its own converter and my memory
> profiler showed that it ended up hogging 200 MB.
Wow, that's interesting.
Did you file a Jira issue and/or would you be able to do a
quickstart to produce that?
Did your converter have
Exactly. I had a component with its own converter and my memory
profiler showed that it ended up hogging 200 MB.
Ofcourse I can organize my own singleton library of converters.. but
Wicket has its own ConverterLocator. I would like to hear if someone
has made such an implementation of ConverterLoc
You can override getConverter() on a component to return any converter you
want.
Thomas
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am a bit confused with the converters in Wicket. I have some numbers
> which I want to display with two
I agree, in general you can have many Behaviors added toghether, and with
a Strategy you would have to choose one from the available options.
Daniel
Thomas Mäder-2 wrote:
>
> It's probably closer to a decorator.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, HHB wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey,
>>
fixed
-igor
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:17 AM, cmoulliard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to mention that there is a bug in the maven pom.xml file of the
> project phonebook because the properties files located here
> "wicketstuff-core\phonebook\src\main\java\wicket\contrib\phonebook\web\page"
> ar
We have started tidying up our
http://code.google.com/p/londonwicket/downloads/list London Wicket Google
Code Project Downloads area . There will also be new material occasionally
posted on http://www.jWeekend.com/dev/ArticlesPage/ jWeekend's resources
page (like our UML class diagram that show
you can override getconverter() on component level
-igor
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am a bit confused with the converters in Wicket. I have some numbers
> which I want to display with two decimals and some other numbers with
> another amout of decimals.
>
>
Hi!
I am a bit confused with the converters in Wicket. I have some numbers
which I want to display with two decimals and some other numbers with
another amout of decimals.
It appears like Wicket has only one instance of BigDecimalConverter,
which is used everywhere. So if I adjust its NumberForma
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, HHB wrote:
> Does maven-jetty-plugin getting used when we run Wicket tests (WicketTester),
> you know, integration tests?
No, WicketTester is for testing the component code in a more
unit-test like fashion [1], without running it in a
container.
But if you do some whitebox /
Does maven-jetty-plugin getting used when we run Wicket tests (WicketTester),
you know, integration tests?
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
>
> On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, HHB wrote:
>> Why POM of a Wicket skeleton application contains maven-jetty-plugin?
>
> To be able to run your application from the command
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, HHB wrote:
> Why POM of a Wicket skeleton application contains maven-jetty-plugin?
To be able to run your application from the command line
with
mvn jetty:run
in the cases when that makes more sense than running a
Jetty.java or something such from the IDE.
Best wishes,
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009, Johan Compagner wrote:
> Talking about apache con eu 2009
> Shouldnt we organize a get to gether?
> I think we can now use the conference rooms of apache con them selfs.
Yes! Being busy family men and consultants, we're planning
to get there on Monday evening and leave on Wed
Hey,
Why POM of a Wicket skeleton application contains maven-jetty-plugin?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Why-Wicket-application-contains-maven-jetty-plugin--tp21899056p21899056.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
It's probably closer to a decorator.
Thomas
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 11:19 AM, HHB wrote:
>
> Hey,
> Is Behaviors in Wicket are implementation of the Strategy Pattern?
> Thanks.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Behaviors-and-Strategy-pattern-tp21897409p21897409.html
>
Talking about apache con eu 2009
Shouldnt we organize a get to gether?
I think we can now use the conference rooms of apache con them selfs.
On 06/02/2009, Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My colleagues Markus Hjort and Marko Sibakov and I are
> holding a full-day training session on apply
Hey,
Is Behaviors in Wicket are implementation of the Strategy Pattern?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Behaviors-and-Strategy-pattern-tp21897409p21897409.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Hello again,
We have now put the current version of the training material
online at
http://www.jdave.org/bdd-wicket/
It can be interesting even if you cannot make it to the session.
We'll be updating the material every now and then.
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Erick Fleming wrote:
> I'm new to unit testing and just trying to get my feet wet. The actual code
> under test would be a panel that should display some data. I guess I don't
> really care to test wicket's dataview but whether or not my panel is
> actually displaying the dat
39 matches
Mail list logo
