Having done Gsoc for 2008 (Unrelated OSS project) I'd suggest
extremely well defined projects, extremely clear project management and
quite a few introductions for tasks expected, not to mention multiple
mentors (For picking up slack) defined targets and monitoring as if
this was a VC set of
[X] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the
choices list as IModel> or List without the
wildcard
Regards,
Erik.
--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: use
> [X] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the
> choices list as IModel> or List without the
> wildcard
**
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
> [X] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the
> choices list as IModel> or List without the
> wildcard
>
> [ ] No, keep DropDownChoice as it is in Wicket 1.4-rc2
Best regards, --- Jan.
-
To unsubscribe,
> [X] Yes, change the DropDownChoice constructor to take the
> choices list as IModel> or List without the
> wildcard
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h.
Background:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1512
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2126
http://www.nabble.com/LDM-with-Generics-for-DropDownChoice-td22155211.html
This works:
= clips
public static void
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
> I'd say that ListView is wrong here.
>
> I created a new Jira issue on fixing that
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2126
>
> and will do if there are no objections or better ideas.
Well, Igor objected very convincingly :)
So now
Multiple browser windows viewing the same application? You can turn on
multi-window support in your application init method by adding:
getPageMapSettings().setAutomaticMultiwindowSupport(true) - I think that's
the naming
This uses different page maps for each window / tab that's open.
--
Jer
Johan,
I was trying to say, in a confused kind of way, that standard practice
is to back a form up with a bean of some kind, and that replacing that
bean with a persistent object wouldn't necessarily increase memory
utilization enough to bother with a detached model. On the other hand
if
file a jira bug with a quickstart please.
-igor
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:34 AM, TH Lim wrote:
>
> I found out that this exception only happened to Wicket-1.4. I tried Wicket
> 1.3.5 and it worked fine. I presume all Wicket 1.3.x works too.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabbl
I found out that this exception only happened to Wicket-1.4. I tried Wicket
1.3.5 and it worked fine. I presume all Wicket 1.3.x works too.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Forms-in-A-Border-tp22252817p22273577.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive
i didnt say you have to have a different object.
I just say dont keep persistent objects in memory between requests. Use
detachable for that.
The only exception i guess is when you create a new object that isnt
persisted yet to the db and you have some kind of wizard to fill it up.
On Sun, Mar 1,
Let's say you have a Java object with 20 fields that's mapped to a
database using Hibernate. I don't see that there's much difference in
terms of memory utilization between using that object as the model and
creating a separate object with 20 fields to use as the model.
Following the prin
Hi,
Does wicket provide any support for multiple application instances per
user's session?
In other words, how does wicket handle multiple browser windows for the
sample application.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket---Multi-Instance-Support-tp22271257p2227
You shouldnt put that object directly in a CPM, but have a loadabled
detachable model in between. Because now you probably have that hib
object in the page between requests
On 28/02/2009, Stephen Swinsburg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm after your thoughts on the following method.
>
> Suppose there is
15 matches
Mail list logo