Hello,
I have a problem about palette. here is the scenario:
if there is already values in selected side and when I add values from
available side there is only n-1 values get. If there is currently 2 values
in the selected side then i add 2 values from available side, i only get 3
values. The la
David Brown-48 wrote:
>
> Hello, please excuse if the wicket-security project is readily visible.
> Otherwise, reply with the link. Much appreciated. Regards, David.
>
Google is your friend :)
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=wicket+security
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pre-bu
I'd actually rather it worked as expected and simply set the object on
the model property :)
However, it's usable so I'll live with it.
- brill
On 13-May-09, at 3:10 PM, nino martinez wael wrote:
Yeah or just another way of thinking.. :)
2009/5/11 Brill Pappin :
Thanks that worked... altho
Great link site Clint... should be called STFW though :)
- Brill
On 13-May-09, at 2:44 PM, Clint Popetz wrote:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=java+serialization+default+constructor&l=1
-Clint
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Douglas Ferguson
wrote:
Why do Wicket-serialized objects require a default
I was going to let you folks come to your own conclusions and
hopefully we wouldn't re-hash the discussion here.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Clint Popetz wrote:
> Is that a way of saying "please don't spend wicket users bandwidth
> with 100+ explanations of why this is not a good ORM for any
lets keep this list reserved for wicket-related flamewars only, keep
the other ones on tss :)
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Clint Popetz wrote:
> Is that a way of saying "please don't spend wicket users bandwidth
> with 100+ explanations of why this is not a good ORM for any
> reasonabl
Is that a way of saying "please don't spend wicket users bandwidth
with 100+ explanations of why this is not a good ORM for any
reasonably complex use case? :)
Oops, too late.
-Clint
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:07 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> Fellow Wicketeers,
>
> Please see the discussion at TSS a
Fellow Wicketeers,
Please see the discussion at TSS about this framework:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=54535
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Jim Xie wrote:
> Dear Wicket Users,
>
>
> Dreamsource ORM has been used in three major applications for over three
> years. I
Dear Wicket Users,
Dreamsource ORM has been used in three major applications for over three
years. It solves the following problems:
1. Whatever you codes happens in database.
2. No detached enhanced object. So it can be used with any frameworks
like Spring, GWT.
3. No lazy loading.
i am guessing "." is a special char in hybrid strategy so it should
escape it. a patch would be welcome, and at least a jira issue.
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> any thoughts? thanks
>
>
> On May 7, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>
>> I'm using the Hybrid
any thoughts? thanks
On May 7, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
I'm using the HybridUrlCodingStrategy and ran into a glitch when I
have parameter values that include the character "."
For example, if I make a link with:
params.add( "p", "Hello 2.01.00" )
This creates a link to:
http
Hello,I have a converter which I can verify is being called, but when the
validator is being called it is not being called on the String value but the
object which causes a ClassCastException.
Here is my converter:
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator l
not getString
new Label("label", new ResourceModel("yourkey"));
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
>
> On 13.05.2009, at 18:40, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
>
>> Good questoin - I'm not sure how that works with wicket:messa
On 13.05.2009, at 18:40, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Good questoin - I'm not sure how that works with wicket:message. But
I suppose you could easily add a label to the fragment and control the
property key to your label easily
Programmatically, you mean, right? Using Component#getString() fo
I see, thanks.
-jim
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> no, validators work on a converted type - same type as the model object
>
> notice your converter is converting the value to a codablevalue type -
> that is the object that the validators will work on - they validate
> the same object that will be p
Yeah or just another way of thinking.. :)
2009/5/11 Brill Pappin :
> Thanks that worked... although its a bit of a pain in the behind :)
>
> - Brill Pappin
>
> On 11-May-09, at 6:55 AM, nino martinez wael wrote:
>
>> You do something like this:
>>
>> // compound model
>> private final IMode
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=java+serialization+default+constructor&l=1
-Clint
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Douglas Ferguson
wrote:
> Why do Wicket-serialized objects require a default constructor?
>
> Exception is:
>
> Caused by:
> java.io.InvalidClassException:com.conducive.logic.scraper.impl.med
Why do Wicket-serialized objects require a default constructor?
Exception is:
Caused by:
java.io.InvalidClassException:com.conducive.logic.scraper.impl.media.MediaScraperResult;
com.conducive.logic.scraper.impl.media.MediaScraperResult; no valid
constructor
java.io.ObjectStreamClass.check
Hi Igor,
I'm a little confused. I attached a StringValidator - shouldn't that work
on a String? Also I assumed Validators work on the values of form fields
after converted to String?Thanks,
--jim
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, james o'brien wrote:
> Hello,I have a converter which I can verify
Hello Günther,
stiq looks very promising. Can you please provide some small snippets
howto use it in correlation with wicket?
Cheers
Per
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e
no, validators work on a converted type - same type as the model object
notice your converter is converting the value to a codablevalue type -
that is the object that the validators will work on - they validate
the same object that will be put into the model if validation passes.
it looks like in
Hi Igor,
I'm a little confused. I attached a StringValidator - shouldn't that work
on a String?
--jim
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> validators work on objects not on raw string values.
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, james o'brien
> wrote:
>> Hello,I have a converter which I can
validators work on objects not on raw string values.
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM, james o'brien wrote:
> Hello,I have a converter which I can verify is being called, but when the
> validator is being called it is not being called on the String value but the
> object which causes a Cla
> I think Igor meant for you to post some code.
There's nothing special..
form = new form
form.add(nestedform = new form)
nestedform.add(new textfield(propertymodel).setRequired(true));
It works most of the time, but sometimes I get the exception.
**
Martin
>
> cheers,
> Steve
>
>
>
> On 13
I think Igor meant for you to post some code.
cheers,
Steve
On 13 May 2009, at 17:27, Martin Makundi wrote:
Ok, I was hoping someone has experienced the same stacktrace.
I will try to reproduce the bug still, maybe I find something.
**
Martin
2009/5/13 Igor Vaynberg :
hard to say without
Hello,I have a converter which I can verify is being called, but when the
validator is being called it is not being called on the String value but the
object which causes a ClassCastException.
Here is my converter:
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator l
Good questoin - I'm not sure how that works with wicket:message. But
I suppose you could easily add a label to the fragment and control the
property key to your label easily
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
> How ca
How can one override properties in Fragments?
Given a component:
which I instantiate twice, say, in
I can override c1's property foo via
c1.foo=Bar
but neither c2.foo=Bar nor fragment.c2.foo=Bar work.
What is the property path to access c2's foo?
Kaspar
---
Hi, I will be compiling wicketstuff-dojo with a dependency on wicket
1.3.4 for an internal project. Does anyone know if there are any
integration issues between those two versions?
Alternatively, is there a better component to use for a
floating div than DojoFloatingPane? I did notice that DojoFl
Ok, I was hoping someone has experienced the same stacktrace.
I will try to reproduce the bug still, maybe I find something.
**
Martin
2009/5/13 Igor Vaynberg :
> hard to say without having something to play against.
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Martin Makundi
> wrote:
>> Hi!
hard to say without having something to play against.
-igor
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Martin Makundi
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a data object Dummy whose attribute "value" has a setMethod
> (setValue) that does not allow the given value to be an empty string
> or null.
>
> This model object
Hi!
I have a data object Dummy whose attribute "value" has a setMethod
(setValue) that does not allow the given value to be an empty string
or null.
This model object is attached to a property model new
PropertyModel(dummy, "value") and the propertymodel is passed to a
TextField component whose "
Problem:
I want to validate input as user types it, but validation takes a long time
on the server. When validation result for the first input is returned, user
might have caused several more input events to be validated. These
validation requests are pending execution on Wicket Ajax Channel. At th
I found the solutionit is not a wicket problem. The problem was in my
CSS files.
marius1maru wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm using a ListView of links limited to only 5 links, an
> AjaxFallbackLink (showMore) that will remove the limitation, and another
> AjaxFallbackLink
> (showLess) that wi
I create a BaseTree like this:
final DefaultTreeModel model = new DefaultTreeModel(...);
IModel< new AbstractReadOnlyModel()
{
@Override
public TreeModel getObject()
{
return model;
}
};
add(new BaseTree("tree", model) { /* ... */ });
When the user c
You can set up IntelliJ to not exclude them. Just go to the compiler
properties for your project and set the exclude to something like
!?*.java.
2009/5/13 Erik van Oosten :
> I always get this for a new app when I run/build it from Eclipse or
> IntelliJ. Both default to exclude resources from the
I always get this for a new app when I run/build it from Eclipse or
IntelliJ. Both default to exclude resources from the java packages.
Build with Maven (change the pom or use quickstart to start with a
correct pom) and the file should be there.
Regards,
Erik.
Tomáš Mihok wrote:
Hi there
When I try this code it works. Can you please post some code for us
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CheckboxMultipleChoice-in-Ajax-style-tp23458553p23520363.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Hi Michael, thank you for your suggestion.
what do you think about overriding the AbstractColumn#populateItem() to add
a Label to the cellItem and setting up a proper IConverter to that
component?
bye
alf
Michael O'Cleirigh wrote:
>
>
> This question came up last week aswell, here is an exa
I've been using http://storytestiq.solutionsiq.com/ STiQ for integration
testing on my current project. It's a mashup of Selenium & Fitnesse. It
makes for a really comfortable test construction & running environment.
I've used JUnit driven Selenium tests in the past, but the tests were
impossi
;-)
If in a soft wall room they hear you taking about "tomcat" (what kind
of a cat?), "hot-swapping", well, aeh, ... they might keep you a
little longer...
On 05.05.2009, at 13:23, nino martinez wael wrote:
I like these kind of monologs, I often do them myself also known as
parrot talks :
41 matches
Mail list logo
