For your example (NavigationToolbar in DefaultDataTable) - just don't
use DefaultDataTable. DDT is provided simply as a convenience with
the most common features of a table. If it does not suit your needs,
create your own subclass of DataTable that uses whatever features you
want. You will see
by your own argument your own code will have to call your
second-chance init constructor before invoking *any* method on the
component.
so instead of
boolean visible=getMyComponent().isvisible();
you will have to now do
Component c=getMyComponent();
if (!c.isinitted()) {c.initI(); }
boolean
Hi Matej,
is it possible to post a little example?
-Peter
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
In order for tree to update items your model must fire treeNodesChanged
event.
-Matej
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Tree-Table---Update-Model-tp23549640p23554149.html
Sent
I'm doing just right like you described. Probably I have to pay more
attention to your comment about improper use of models. isVisible method
should rely only on the component model. I some cases it is easier to
delegate some calls to aggregated components. But instead I have to work
with
Igor,
I didn't mean spreading this approach everywhere :) My intention was to draw
your attention on that onBeforeRender probably is a good place to delay
construction but should be used with extra care and some sort of
simplification (more appropriate method) would be great.
You turned it
Where you were two years ago? :)
ptrthomas wrote:
Hi,
I blogged a fairly large collection of links to discussions about the
issues
with JSF in general. What prompted me to put this up is that I yet again
failed to convince a team at work that Wicket should be chosen over JSF.
Hmm,
Not sure if I can convince my boss (or maybe even me myself) by this blog
entry. The title is subjective at best to start with and to open up with blog
entries from 5 years ago is not giving it more credibility.
I have worked with jsf (myfaces and icefaces) on 2 projects and to be honest I
even more ... the title sounds a bit vulgarly.
But the arrangement of such links has a value itself. Especially for people
who hasn't started a project yet.
I would sort the list by date descending. The latest articles has more value
than older.
jeroend-2 wrote:
...
The title is
Collapsing the node works :)
+Leena
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Illegal-State-Exception-on-DefaultTeeModel.removeNodeFromParent-tp20185042p23556124.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The horse is pretty alive -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1134.
Jeremy Thomerson-5 wrote:
With regards to multiple wicket:extend tags - that is also an old,
dead horse that doesn't need to be beat right now. The user list has
a lot of discussion on it. The simplest way to
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote:
The catching AuthenticationException and returning false is something
I'm not familiar with. I don't think I've mentioned it? Please refresh
my memory, maybe I have mentioned it. ;-)
It would be in the authenticate
The catching AuthenticationException and returning false is something
I'm not familiar with. I don't think I've mentioned it? Please refresh
my memory, maybe I have mentioned it. ;-)
It would be in the authenticate method of mine. If the exception is
thrown, you'd need to return false.
Ah,
Hi,
I want googlebot to be able to see content that is shown to normal
browsers using ajax. I use a fallback ajax link but because googlebot
does not use sessions the links need to be bookmarkable. The problem
seems to be because the link contains an ajax behaviour it is
considered
Note that this is a maven problem.
Apparently maven does not use the correct 'home' directory. You can
override the home directory set by setting an environment variable. I
think its called M2_REPO.
Regards,
Erik.
Henrik schreef:
I am very new to the Java-World and want to make a web
hmm true, I think it's because it's ajax and actually get set before
the form are submited. I agree it would be nice if it acted exactly
like normal form, but I guess the way it are now allows much more
flexibility, however it should be possible to do the other aswell.
regards
2009/5/14 Brill
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Most java programmers know not to call overridable methods from the
constructor as a general rule, although there are times when it could
inadvertantly happen - which is why we need bug reports if you see
that
Hi,
I have a doubt about application-scoped objects.
What's the pro and cons of setting an object instance into my
WebApplication class or define that class as singleton (using a static
method to access it) ?
Thank you
alf
Hi,
at wicket features security
there is a mention about:
There are plans for the next version of Wicket to add URL encryption to
support highly secure web sites.
is this already ended?
please, let me know asap, i am preparing an architecture documentation to
justify wicket at this point.
Hi,
at wicket features security
there is a mention about:
There are plans for the next version of Wicket to add URL encryption to
support highly secure web sites.
is this already ended?
please, let me know asap, i am preparing an architecture documentation to
justify wicket at this point.
hi, again
regarding wicket features scalability, clustering
there is a mention about:
The next version of Wicket will support client-side models for zero-state
scalability.
is this already released?
please, let me know asap.
thank you.
we already have url encryption (based on a session id as seed)
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 14:52, manuelbarzi manuelba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
at wicket features security
there is a mention about:
There are plans for the next version of Wicket to add URL encryption to
support highly secure
nope that is dropped and isnt very likely implemented in a coming release
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 15:15, manuelbarzi manuelba...@gmail.com wrote:
hi, again
regarding wicket features scalability, clustering
there is a mention about:
The next version of Wicket will support client-side
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Alfredo Aleandri
alfredo.alean...@logobject.ch wrote:
Hi,
I have a doubt about application-scoped objects.
What is your doubt?
What's the pro and cons of setting an object instance into my WebApplication
class or define that class as singleton (using a static
Alfredo Aleandri wrote:
I have a doubt about application-scoped objects.
What's the pro and cons of setting an object instance into my
WebApplication class or define that class as singleton (using a static
method to access it) ?
Pro: Singletons are easy to use
Contra: They make Unit tests
Hi James,
I would like to know what is the difference between a Singleton class with a
static accessor method and POJO stored into my WebApplication class (with
proper getter).
What is the preferred way to set an application scoped object?
Thank you again...
--
View this message in context:
Documentation is always welcome. This is a very active list (one of
the most active that I've seen with an open source project) where the
core devs spend a lot of quality time answering questions. There's
not enough hours in the day for us to also add that to documentation
or provide everyone
Use injection. The difference is that there is no way to override the
implementation of the static accessor / singleton for testing
functionality. If you instead use an IoC container (Spring / Guice)
and injection, you are not statically tying yourself to a single
class. Work off the interface,
Is your Ajax link redirecting you to another page? Or is it swapping
something out on the page? I suppose you could create a bookmarkable
link and add the ajax behavior to it, but this seems counterintuitive
because it is unlikely that you have an ajax link that is simply
redirecting you to a
googlebot does not support cookies, so your container will add
jsessionid into the url. so unless googlebot specifically ignores
jsessionid (which doesnt look to be the case because there are plenty
links in google with jsessionid) it should all work.
-igor
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:19 AM, John
Hi,
I want to display a table structure, however the data retrieving takes a
certain time. Currently I use the AjaxLazyLoadPanel to display all results
at once.
But in future I'd like to to immediately display it on the page when it is
retrieved. So I need some kind of table where I can add
But you don't want URLs with jsessionid in Google's results. Multiple
people can come into your site with the same session.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
googlebot does not support cookies, so
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Use injection. The difference is that there is no way to override the
implementation of the static accessor / singleton for testing
functionality. If you instead use an IoC container (Spring / Guice)
and
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
Interestingly, in the long-standing defacto
article on asking smart questions, the very first thing it says to do
is to search the forums [1].
FWIW, I did search the list, before posting. I found a lot of
I actually had to Google that one. But, yes, that is the general
consensus that I've seen. If you wanted to write a page that showed
the different ways that you mentioned, that would be fine. It really
just depends on if you really need lazy component creation, and then
how you want to
Thank you to all for your precious suggestions.
My question is not for a real need.
Supposing to discard the injection strategy, I would like to know if the
cache of an object into my WebApplication class during application startup
has the same result if I make this object Singleton (and not
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:18 PM, alf.redo
alfredo.alean...@logobject.ch wrote:
Thank you to all for your precious suggestions.
My question is not for a real need.
Supposing to discard the injection strategy, I would like to know if the
cache of an object into my WebApplication class during
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Kent Larsson kent.lars...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like a nicer solution!
I'll look into doing something like that myself, being a Wicket newbie
it might take me a while though. Are there any examples of doing
anything similar available somewhere?
Well, I've
I read in previous post that if it is weblogic then its better to use wicket
filter rather than wicket servlet and more over I am using open view
session filter and as this filter order is important , please suggst me if
I should go with wicket-servlet or wicket filter , I know
filter
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:21 PM, tubin gen fachh...@gmail.com wrote:
I read in previous post that if it is weblogic then its better to use wicket
filter rather than wicket servlet and more over I am using open view
session filter and as this filter order is important , please
i updated this dependency to resolve
dependency
groupIdorg.slf4j/groupId
artifactIdslf4j-api/artifactId
version1.5.5/version
/dependency
previously i had 1.4
Lars Vonk wrote:
You should also check your dependencies using the maven dependency plugin.
Are
is there an extension to wicket filter to get the application class from
spring ?
James Carman-3 wrote:
filter
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:21 PM, tubin gen fachh...@gmail.com wrote:
I read in previous post that if it is weblogic then its better to use
wicket
filter rather than wicket
sorry that wasa wrong question , my applicaqtion has the following filters
1st open-view-session-filter
2nd org.acegisecurity.util.FilterToBeanProxy
3rd wicket filter
is this order proper ?
fachhoch wrote:
is there an extension to wicket filter to get the application class from
Check out my example application:
http://svn.carmanconsulting.com/public/wicket-advanced/trunk
That application does exactly what you are looking to do. It's got
the spring security filter stuff all configured.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM, fachhoch fachh...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry that
43 matches
Mail list logo
