This is improved in 1.5.x
In 1.4.x there is an improved version of GuiceComponentInjector which
does caching.
See the migration wiki page for 1.4 - 1.5 for details.
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 12:23 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
no, as far as i see the guice injector is written in a way that does
not
Thanks !
Great work!
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 11:48 -0400, Michael O'Cleirigh wrote:
Hello,
Based on the positive reception for a 1.4.7 wicketstuff-core release, 4
positive votes (3 + mine) and no negative, I promoted the staged
release into the sonatype repository and filed the ticket for
Thomas Kappler wrote:
On 05/21/10 14:57, napple fabble wrote:
We're starting a new project and thinking about using Wicket for
presentation
layer.
One concern is about backwards compatibility and support. I understand
1.5
is coming and in not fully backwards compatible.
The
It's funny how you combine Wicket (i.e. open source) and vendor lock-in,
two antithetic terms I'd never put together in a single sentence.
Please search lock in the following post for arguments:
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/jsf-sucks/
If you choose JSF, all what's guaranteed is
Sorry, what was the use case after all?
Sven
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/announce-Release-Wicket-1-4-9-tp2228179p2229772.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
I'm using a integration of jqgrid with wicket.
jqgrid renders its cells from json data that is retrieved from the server.
I've got this behavior and other operations of jqgrid(search/edit) working
for some time now.
I want to have one of the columns hold a link to some info page.
For
Hello!
Maybe a simple question, but I didn't figured it out yet. I have a set
of very simular mainly static pages, so I want to use one java class
and depending on a given parameter use differnt html-markup files. Is
there a method that does this kind of redirect or changes the name of
the
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-vendor-lockin-and-backwards-compatibility-1-4-1-5-tp2226109p2229818.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
It is *not* a theoretical objection. Please see:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6489540
This is a real problem that Sun (now Oracle I guess) has identified
and is working on.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Alex Objelean alex.objel...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't want to
Sven Meier wrote:
It's funny how you combine Wicket (i.e. open source) and vendor lock-in,
two antithetic terms I'd never put together in a single sentence.
Please search lock in the following post for arguments:
http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/jsf-sucks/
If you choose
Yes, I wouldn't think the vendor lock-in (in the traditional sense)
doesn't really apply here. If you're choosing to use Wicket, then
you're pretty much stuck with Wicket. You can't take your Wicket
application code and plop it down in a JSF or Struts or Tapestry
application and have it
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:25 AM, napple fabble jm.postili...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why it's written as vendor lockin, not vendor lockin. Perhaps
framework lockin would have been better.
To put it simply, when I choose JSF or wicket I create a permanent, hard to
change, binding to that
Hi Sven!
See the task description details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2846
Alex
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/announce-Release-Wicket-1-4-9-tp2228179p2229836.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Sam,
I'm using a flavor of wijqgrid. I took wijqgrid as a base code and made
major modifications to almost everything.
It is a pity some of those modifications never made it back into the
original:-(. But I'm still glad to hear the code was useful to you: at
least as a starting point.
Thanks for doing the work.
Steve
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Michael O'Cleirigh
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote:
Hello,
Based on the positive reception for a 1.4.7 wicketstuff-core release, 4
positive votes (3 + mine) and no negative, I promoted the staged release
into the
Hi all,
On a wicketstuff related note, do you think there is any benefit of trying
to keep the release cycles of the wicketstuff inline with the core wicket
projects?
I do understand that there is a wide variety of modules under the
wicketstuff banner, and ensuring it is all compatible is not
I do believe there's an initiative to keep versions aligned. However
we had to put out 1.4.7 first, and I think we will bump to 1.4.9
snap..
2010/5/25 Steve Mactaggart st...@whitesquaresoft.com:
Hi all,
On a wicketstuff related note, do you think there is any benefit of trying
to keep the
Yeah, it's the same with hibernate, all the Apache portifolio, open
source projects and java itself. If there comes no new JSR's, java
stalls. However with opensource stuff you have the source available.
And that's a guarantee I like.
2010/5/25 James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com:
On Tue,
Hi,
Did you find a solution for this?
I'm using wicket 1.4.8 and get almost the same error. Like you I have a
customized column with a Link component in a datagrid. I have an ajax search
field which updates the data (and the links) in the data grid when changing
the search input. Sometimes if I
I guess the other issue is what is the data like?
If you had a class called MenuItem that had a name and a ListMenuItem as
children then you could create a panel
MenuItemPanel extends Panel {
public MenuItemPanel(String id, IModelMenuItem model) {
{
super(id, model);
add(new
I would really appreciate if someone explains the difference between
component-id and markup-id in wicket.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/componentId-and-markupId-tp2229995p2229995.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The componentId is a server-side identifier of the component used to build
the component hierarchy, while markupId is a client-side (in the html
markup).
Ex: you can have a component with id 'panel' and markupId
'left-container'... with the following markup:
div id=left-container'/div
Alex
I've been thinking about this whole idea of needing to access the
application object in different threads idea. What if the Application
class had a method like this:
public Runnable wrap(Runnable task)
Basically, the Application would create a Runnable object that can be
run within the context
Sorry, subject should be wrap() method, not runAs().
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:33 AM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
I've been thinking about this whole idea of needing to access the
application object in different threads idea. What if the Application
class had a method like
Mine is J2ee application using wicket, spring , hibernate , groovy .I also
want to try grails can I integrate grails into my wicket app ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/integrate-grails-into-my-wicket-app-tp2230055p2230055.html
Sent from the
I thought of contributing some of the changes after a while but then I
realized they were too
project specific and not abstract enough so no one else would be able to use
em.
Example: I created a JQGridDataProvider that the grid uses but the provider
is tightly tied to hibernate
and some other
You could use style for this if you'd like, and use a PageParameter to set
the style in the constructor (SomePage_style1.html, SomePage_style2.html)
public SomePage(PageParameters params) {
setStyle(params.get(style));
}
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Daniel Aschauer
Hello,
I am building a Wicket Application that I want to run as a standalone app
and and as an open social gadget (as proxied content, see
http://wiki.opensocial.org/index.php?title=Social_Application_Tutorial here
if you are interested).
As I learned from
Hello Igor,
that is what I tried. I could not do that with a header contribution, as
they seem to be before the wicket-ajax.js. Even if I added inline script in
the head: the wicket-ajax.js was always included after that. The only way I
could make it work was to add inline script in the body,
Great news, thanks!
Another stuff:
am I the only one, who can't build wicketstuff because of the
wicket-html5's following (not available) dependency:
org.mortbay.jetty:maven-jetty-plugin:pom:7.0.2.v20100331 ?
Regards,
Peter
2010-05-24 17:48 keltezéssel, Michael O'Cleirigh írta:
Hello,
Based
am I the only one, who can't build wicketstuff because of the
wicket-html5's following (not available) dependency:
org.mortbay.jetty:maven-jetty-plugin:pom:7.0.2.v20100331 ?
sorry, I just had to git svn rebase the thing...
-
I am having a problem using FileUploadField in wicket 1.4.1.
The code behind this is writing a temporary file to java.io.tmpdir (see
getTempFile() in DiskFileItem).
The java hosting service I'm using doesn't grant access to the temp
directory, nor does it allow the changing of system
can you use write(File) instead of getTempFile()?
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:59 PM, mdh mhorn...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I am having a problem using FileUploadField in wicket 1.4.1.
The code behind this is writing a temporary file to java.io.tmpdir (see
getTempFile() in DiskFileItem).
The java
Hello!
I'm new at the wicket framework.
I want to try with a simple application which uses
* one part for manipulation (login == after login for manipulation
and logout
* one part where a tree list of objects (POI's)with root element and
2 levels
* one part where a map is
What I'm actually doing is importing an image into a database. My code opens
an input stream on the file selected by the user
(FileUploadField.getFileUpload().getInputStream()) , and uses that to create
a blob in the database.
I don't do any file writing in my code, that's done in the background
create your own FileItemFactory that returns a DatabaseImageStorageFileItem
(which you'll have to create). When the request is processed, your
DatabaseImageStorageFileItem
will be created, and then getOutputStream will be called, which you should
use to return a stream that will write into the
Hello,
Now that wicketstuff-core 1.4.7 is released I want to schedule when the
1.4.8 and 1.4.9 releases should be performed to give everyone enough
time to get their changes in and do any related testing.
I think separate branching could be an option but we should wait until
after we catch
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca wrote:
Hello,
Now that wicketstuff-core 1.4.7 is released I want to schedule when the
1.4.8 and 1.4.9 releases should be performed to give everyone enough time to
get their changes in and do any related
Michael,
Was wicketstuff-core 1.4.7 built against wicket 1.4.7? or against 1.4.8/9?
(whatever was released at the time).
I'm guessing 1.4.7.
If the current wicketstuff code compiles against 8 and 9, I agree with
Jeremy in getting it released now, and any fixes or issues to roll into the
1.4.10.
Now I write this that creates even more issues, what if there is a critical
issue in wicketstuff that needs to push the version number? Should it
become 1.4.9.1 or 1.4.10?
This was always the issue with the matching release numbers. But, since
most projects in wicketstuff are hardly
Hi all,
I have just run into a situation where I want to create a
BookmarkablePageLink that changes its class based on some data thats
supplied to it.
For example lets say I had a Customer object that had an enabled flag on
it, and we want to have 2 different pages shown for enabled/disabled
getpageclass() is final because the class takes the destination page
class as a constructor arg, and so it would be weird to let the users
break the contract so easily.
also, it is a trivial class, and it is trivial to make your own:
class mybpl extends linkcustomer {
public final void
The main alternative we're comparing wicket to is using JSF. The vendor
lockin problem is less of a risk there. If we implement our app with
JSF2.0, we're pretty much guaranteed support and bug fixes for that for 10
years by the commercial app server vendors. If we decide to use
Hi,
now I tried jwicket-examples and it works quite well. But at the momemt I
stuck into a problem and I hope you can help me out.
I have a Panel Placeholder that implements IDroppable
And a Panel Field that implements IDraggable
So I have some empty Placeholders and a few Placeholders that are
44 matches
Mail list logo
