Hi,
thanks for answer, I was wondering if that is a normal behavior even for
parent forms to process their values from input when nested form
submits. Anyway, good to know it's supposed to be.
Regards,
--
Marek Šabo
On 11/01/2010 05:49 AM, Martin Makundi wrote:
Hi!
Yes. Every time form
RawInput is how the form values are kept. Otherwise you will lose
all values and have an empty form for example in page repaint.
**
Martin
2010/11/1 Marek Šabo ms...@buk.cvut.cz:
Hi,
thanks for answer, I was wondering if that is a normal behavior even for
parent forms to process their values
Hi,
ok, that makes sense, and how would that be (if somehow) affected by
using setPersistent on formComponents (afaik form cookie support)?
Regards,
--
Marek Šabo
On 11/01/2010 09:22 AM, Martin Makundi wrote:
RawInput is how the form values are kept. Otherwise you will lose
all values
Thanks, i'm looking at the examples and i'll get back to you if i figure out
how to get multiple graphs on one page.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/flot-examples-tp3013635p3021887.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi there, regarding this code, i have a problem, it is trying to acess a url
that dos not exist once the wicket application class name is diferent the
real application url. it is trying to access http://localhost/(aplication
name) but it is deployed with a diferent name because the war file has a
In my attempts to integrate a javascript client-side framework (ext-js) to
wicket, I'm running into the problem that the client-side framework expects
URLs to send requests to, expecting a JSON/XML response. This is of course
perfectly natural behavior for a js framework.
The documentation I
did you check why it returns false? ajax requests should not increment
the page version, so they should always be current. people have
built extjs integrations before, you may look into one of those for
hints.
-igor
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Frank van Lankvelt
f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com
Hi there!
I'm extreamly new to Whicket, trying to put together my first sample
application based on the AuthenticatedWebSession example.
I have everything up and running nicely now, but I'd like to make a few
simple changes.
On the LoginPage, there are feilds for username, password and a check
it pulls that value out of its model, so check whatever object the
model is pointing to.
-igor
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:44 AM, adam.gibbons adam.s.gibb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there!
I'm extreamly new to Whicket, trying to put together my first sample
application based on the
Adam,
If you are just getting started, models are one of the most important and
underappreciated aspects of mastering Wicket. It's really worth putting in the
time up front to learn their nuances.
Have you checked out the excellent Wicket In Action book by Manning Press?
It's one of those
In my opinnion best way to learn is by trial and error ;)
Not the most profitable way, though ;)
**
Martin
2010/11/1 Brian Topping topp...@codehaus.org:
Adam,
If you are just getting started, models are one of the most important and
underappreciated aspects of mastering Wicket. It's
As they say, a million monkeys on typewriters will eventually produce the
works of Shakespeare. :-)
I guess I'm lazy, to each his own.
On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Martin Makundi wrote:
In my opinnion best way to learn is by trial and error ;)
Not the most profitable way, though ;)
I am using wicket 1.4.12 and wicket-push 1.4.8 , will this combination work
fine or can cause any issues ?
I cannot upgrade to wicket push to 1.4.12 because of bugs .
Please tell me if it is ok to use this combination ?
--
View this message in context:
hi!
what better way to send an object to webpage?
I'm sending in constructor but the URI is not friendly.
thanks!
Yes, this is safe.
Sebastian did some great work cleaning up the original API and classes.
The examples have also been extended to make the usage scenarios much
clearer.
We are working on moving all this work into wicketstuff right now, we
would love for you to test it later as it becomes
it returned false because
a) the locking request was not ajax
b) the current request was ajax
c) they shared the same page version
Page versioning is disabled, though that shouldn't matter. (that might be a
worthwhile additional check before comparing versions; I'm not very familiar
with
I wonder if anyone can help with the following bug in my code.
It relates to a Panel which contains a DropDownChoice.
This is the exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot format given Object as a Number
at java.text.DecimalFormat.format(DecimalFormat.java:487)
at
Hi,
you get this exception because you set as object model an Account object
and not a Long one, which is the expected type for model. I suppose you
should pass just Account id field as object model.
I wonder if anyone can help with the following bug in my code.
It relates to a Panel which
I have notice that the WebApplication class has a private instance variable
wich gets the name of the class. It has a getter, but i do not see the
setter. Is it possible to change? Can we override the getName() method and
return the name we want, with no problems to the application?
Thanks a lot
Passing objects to webpage via constructor is fine if you feel
comfortable with it. If you wanna change URI you should take a look at
Wicket URL Coding strategies:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/url-coding-strategies.html. Using coding
strategies you should be able to change URL as you
Take a look at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/protocol/http/WicketFilter.java
It calls setName() on the application object using the name of the
filter. Are you using WicketFilter?
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:57 PM, msantos mpssan...@gmail.com
Hi there.
Probably your accountsList has a value wich cannot be converted to long.
What does that list contains?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDownChoice-tp3022770p3022872.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You could pass the id of the object (if possible) as a
PageParameter. You can then use a bookmarkable URL for your page.
You'll have to lookup the object from the db, though. Again, this is
only possible if the object is an entity.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:04 PM, andrea del bene
the wicket version that i am using is 1.4.12, and that method on the
Application class does not exist neither on the WicketFilter. Wich version
is that source code you linked me?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
it can only be set once on the 1.5M version
/**
* Sets application name. This method must be called before any other
methods are invoked and
* can only be called once per application instance.
*
* @param name
*unique application name
its working. thanks a lot
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/WebPage-geting-string-tp2993717p3022961.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe,
Hello,
I am using the wicket-extensions wizard. On applyState() of a wizard step, I
am calling my back end to update some data.
There is a corner condition under which the update might fail, and we would
like to stay in the current step and display a message.
I thought about overriding the
Just to clarify, I try setting then setComplete(false), but that creates an
internal error message added by the wizard. I am thinking of creating the
feedback panel for my wizard with a filter to accept only my messages, but I
am not sure if that is the best approach,
-nelson
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010
so why is there the non-ajax request?
once the page is loaded everything else - communication with ext -
should be happening via ajax requests...
-igor
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Frank van Lankvelt
f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com wrote:
it returned false because
a) the locking request was not
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:09 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.comwrote:
You could pass the id of the object (if possible) as a
PageParameter. You can then use a bookmarkable URL for your page.
You'll have to lookup the object from the db, though. Again, this is
only possible if the
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
In my opinnion best way to learn is by trial and error ;)
True but:
Not the most profitable way, though ;)
That's the problem. Wicket makes it very easy to get up-and-running. And
in doing so,
On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Brian Topping wrote:
As they say, a million monkeys on typewriters will eventually produce the
works of Shakespeare. :-)
FWIW, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem describes what I was
talking about here.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
And, of course, it opens you up to doing more security checks i.e., you
have editUserProfile.html?userID=123 - now you have to check that the signed
in person is allowed to edit whatever user they are trying
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Brian Topping topp...@codehaus.org wrote:
FWIW, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem describes what I
was talking about here.
And I had already trained 5 monkeys to code Wicket. I thought you were serious!
On Nov 2, 2010, at 12:31 AM, James Carman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Brian Topping topp...@codehaus.org wrote:
FWIW, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem describes what I
was talking about here.
And I had already trained 5 monkeys to code Wicket. I thought
The Wicket team is proud to announce that we have released Apache Wicket 1.4
.13. This is a bugfix release on the 1.4.x (stable) branch.
To download: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.13
Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.13/
Changelog:
36 matches
Mail list logo
