Did you register this custom markup filter ?
See org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupParserFactory javadoc to see how to do
it.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado <
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I tried the filter and the filter runs quite well but no change on
Yes I did it.
It runs as I told but does not change body
Martin Grigorov wrote:
>Did you register this custom markup filter ?
>See org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupParserFactory javadoc to see how to do
>it.
>
>On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado <
>gagui...@aguilardelgado.com
Run the debugger and see what happens.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado <
gagui...@aguilardelgado.com> wrote:
> Yes I did it.
>
> It runs as I told but does not change body
>
> Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> >Did you register this custom markup filter ?
> >See org.apache.wick
Solved: in log I have found this (was blind...):
SEVERE: Exception starting filter WicketFilter
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Mount path cannot be under '/resources'
but I don't know why this restriction...
Laco
> -Original Message-
> From: Ladislav DANKO [mailto:em...@1ac0.net]
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ladislav DANKO wrote:
> Solved: in log I have found this (was blind...):
> SEVERE: Exception starting filter WicketFilter
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Mount path cannot be under '/resources'
>
> but I don't know why this restriction...
>
> This path is sp
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 10:31 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Cc: Ladislav DANKO
> Subject: Re: memory leak (solved)
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ladislav DANKO
> wrote:
>
> > Solved: in log
Hi
Some time (years?) ago someone wrote about a component that would change
your disabled forms to a more beautiful version(depends on what you want I
guess), replacing the disabled textboxes with labels etc.. Can any of you
remember where it was located, a search on nabble and google did'nt turn
I guess the more who buys the book the more chance there is to get a revised
edition or maybe a new book at some point.. So please buy it :)
regards Nino
2011/3/4 Josh Kamau
> You can buy Wicket In Action From manning. Its the best book so far. I
> think
> it would be piracy if i send you my co
org.apache.wicket.Application.newMapperContext()
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Ladislav DANKO wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 10:31 AM
> > To: users@wicket.apache.org
> > Cc: Ladislav DANKO
> >
Hi,
I would like to add a "select all" checkbox to header of column in
DefaultDataTable header. I extended AbstractColumn class, but couldn't
add it to the HeadersToolbar in DefaultDataTable, because it expects
Label in header, I guess.
Is there any example how to put checkbox into DataTable he
AFAIR you can read it for free for a limited time when you sign up for
a trial account on safari from o'reilly.
http://my.safaribooksonline.com/book/web-development/wicket/9781932394986
Martijn
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Jehan wrote:
> Dear All
>
> If any one have apache wicket eBook then
It's our way of promoting new features :)
Seriously, it sounds like a bug in eclipse—and yes I've noticed it too.
Martijn
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since integrating the 1.5 branch in my project, I have an annoying behavior
> in Eclipse 3.6 with the
Fixed with r1077871.
Thanks to Attila Kiraly for the investigation and the patch!
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> It's our way of promoting new features :)
>
> Seriously, it sounds like a bug in eclipse—and yes I've noticed it too.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at
Hello,
Let's say I want to write some UI to edit some complicated configuration
split into multiple entities in multiple maven modules. The UI needs to
have one entry point though. So:
Let's create the UI based on TabbedPanel. Each of the tabs will be
provided by different maven modules by t
Hi guys,
Thanks again for the previous help with the LoadableDetachableModel.
Now I have a "workflow problem" related to LDM for which I think you
guys might have a more elegant solution.
I have a hibernate collection which is shown by a ListView. Each item is
passed to a LDM and rendered wit
Not completely sure what you're getting at, would RefreshingView help you?
http://wicket.apache.org/apidocs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/markup/repeater/RefreshingView.html
From: Alexandru Artimon
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 03/04/2011 08:31 AM
Subject:LoadableDetachableModel s
possibly: http://wicket.visural.net/examples/app/view-or-edit
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Disable-form-prettyfier-tp3334921p3335271.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Not really,
I want to find out what you guys do when in a form you add a new item to
a collection(where the items are passed to a LDM and then showed). Do
you save first the item and then pass it to a LDM? Or do you use a plain
model? Or maybe something else?
I'm trying to see that I'm not h
Hi,
I use a custom refreshingview which uses a LDM for existing items, and a
serializing model for new items. When converting the input in my custom
refreshingview (which is the component that "owns" the list) I handle
both types of models. On refresh (re-display) it "replaces" the
serializin
I'm not totally understanding so I will let someone else try to answer but
RefreshingView may apply to this question...
what if the user decides to leave the page without saving the form. At the
next load the empty-items will be there which is not the desired
functionality
From: Alexandru
Bas,
This is what I wanted to find out if you guys use a different model for
new items(before saving them).
I had previously headed in the wrong way by not using LDM so I wanted to
be sure I'm doing it correctly now.
Thanks,
Alexandru
On 03/04/2011 04:19 PM, Bas Gooren wrote:
Hi,
I use a
Well, I'm not sure if I'm using the most desireable solution, but this
is what works for us after some years of wicket experience.
I certainly would not pre-insert new items, because that means that all
constraints are out the window.
Bas
Op 4-3-2011 15:33, Alexandru Artimon schreef:
Bas,
Okay but why not use an AjaxEditableLabel, then you don't have to manage
multiple components and state is managed for you?
From: "robert.mcguinness"
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Date: 03/04/2011 08:59 AM
Subject:Re: Disable form "prettyfier"
possibly: http://wicket.visural.n
Hi all,
I would like web designers could deploy its html, css and images
independentely from developer deploys.
I thought to have 2 projects. One for developers and their classes and
another one for web designers. Web designers' project will be deployed using
a maven profile as a shared l
Hi... my site in production has been running and after our latest code
change we started to get the error below after a few days. It appears
it is something to do with wicket's PageMap. In the past this error
would come up after weeks or months of the app running [we were
re-starting tomcat fair
Apologies for the duplicate posting. It seems when I posted the previous one
I wasn't subscribed to mailing list.
I would like to drag an item from list A into list B but instead of removing
the item from list A, I would like to create a copy of the dragged item into
list B.
Also, If I drag item
In mycase I have several different things, like dropdowns checkboxes etc...
2011/3/4
> Okay but why not use an AjaxEditableLabel, then you don't have to manage
> multiple components and state is managed for you?
>
>
>
>
> From: "robert.mcguinness"
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Date: 0
So does has anybody run it on wicket 1.5, or is there something in the works
for it?
regards Nino
Hmm looking at trunk it does not seem so.. I'll port the vieworedit
component to wicket 1.5..
2011/3/4 nino martinez wael
> So does has anybody run it on wicket 1.5, or is there something in the
> works for it?
>
> regards Nino
>
If I am using AbstractFormValidator and in some places, I am using
setRequired, default validation on components. What is the best way to
remove the validation "temporarily" Let's say I am in a view only mode
and fields are disabled, I want to remove validation. And then later
on, may add back t
I've created a 1.5 branch and it's in the works. 1.5 broke more stuff
than expected :)
Hopefully I can have a beta 1.5 branch functional within a few weeks
Sent from my iPhone
On 05/03/2011, at 6:15 AM, nino martinez wael
wrote:
> So does has anybody run it on wicket 1.5, or is there something
a much simpler way is to set a guid in both a cookie and session every
time they login, then on every request make sure the guid matches. if
it doesnt it means its a stale login.
-igor
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:33 AM, shetc wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Following a security assessment, I have been asked
Hi
Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2
i think this method ment to be overridden?
am i missing something?
Thanks
Hi,
i have a markup (Loop) for a couple of fields. Its a dynamic form and all
the fields are text except one or two,
Sample Markup:
34 matches
Mail list logo
