Re: Servlet Mapping Expectations

2011-03-05 Thread devush
Hi, I am able to get the request related information from both Request and WebRequest. Thanks for that. This i am able to do in the WebPage. My WebApplication getHomePage is called when ever I call /app or /app/, so I have to intercept the request before that. I am trying with mount(String, Packa

Re: DiskPageStore - Error FileNotFoundException

2011-03-05 Thread Igor Vaynberg
something else, other then wicket, may be eating up your filehandles. just because wicket gets the exception doesnt mean its causing it. ask your admin to list the files that are held open to see what they are. and, yes, also upgrade to latest ver. -igor On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Jeffrey Sc

Re: Panel factories and @SpringBean

2011-03-05 Thread Igor Vaynberg
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/10/creating-pluggable-applications-with-wicket-and-spring/ -igor 2011/3/4 Leszek Gawron : > Hello, > > Let's say I want to write some UI to edit some complicated configuration > split into multiple entities in multiple maven modules. The UI needs to have > one entry

Re: Servlet Mapping Expectations

2011-03-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:03 PM, devush wrote: > Hi, > I have following settings in web.xml > > >myserv >/app/* > > > > I expect that all requests such as: > /app > /app/abc > /app/xyz > should come to the servlet. But only /app currently works. > > They actually come but since

Servlet Mapping Expectations

2011-03-05 Thread devush
Hi, I have following settings in web.xml myserv /app/* I expect that all requests such as: /app /app/abc /app/xyz should come to the servlet. But only /app currently works. Moreover, I want to access the getRequestURL part from the servlet API also, so that i can use the infor

Re: Checkbox in DataTable header

2011-03-05 Thread Josh Kamau
Hi User CheckGroup, Check and CheckGroupSelector components. See the corresponding javadocs for details. Josh. 2011/3/4 David MatouĊĦek > Hi, > I would like to add a "select all" checkbox to header of column in > DefaultDataTable header. I extended AbstractColumn class, but couldn't add > it to

RE: Good way to remove validation globally from a page or panel

2011-03-05 Thread Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS]
I should have clarified. Yea, if you have input fields with a dozen or so fields and you have 50% disabled. But you are using the AbstractFormValidator validate() { get("field1").getInput; get("field2").getInput ... And doing validation checks, I guess this isn't a good approach. I have to keep

Re: DropDown replacing text field

2011-03-05 Thread Arjun Dhar
(And whats wrong with Nabble ..its got this annoying Ajax interface) :( Ugh!!! - Don't take life too seriously, your'e not getting out it alive anyway! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDown-replacing-text-field-tp3336347p3336427.html Sent from th

Re: DropDown replacing text field

2011-03-05 Thread Arjun Dhar
Thanks...but curiosity : why wont that work in the first place? - Don't take life too seriously, your'e not getting out it alive anyway! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDown-replacing-text-field-tp3336347p3336426.html Sent from the Users forum m

Re: DropDown replacing text field

2011-03-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
Use two s - one with inside, and one with Swap the fragments On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Arjun Dhar wrote: > Hi, > i have a markup (Loop) for a couple of fields. Its a dynamic form and all > the fields are text except one or two, > Sample Markup: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now in the Java

Re: Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2 ?

2011-03-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3218 There is a thread in the mailing list. Search in Nabble. On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote: > Hi > Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2 > i think this method ment to be overridden? > am i missing something? > Thanks >

Re: Good way to remove validation globally from a page or panel

2011-03-05 Thread Martin Grigorov
When you are in View mode then either your components are not form components (e.g. is replaced with //...) or as you said they are disabled. Form submit will not send name/value pair for disabled form elements. I think the first approach is better regarding user experience. See visural's "view o