Hi,
I am able to get the request related information from both Request
and WebRequest. Thanks for that. This i am able to do in the WebPage.
My WebApplication getHomePage is called when ever I call /app or
/app/, so I have to intercept the request before that.
I am trying with mount(String, Packa
something else, other then wicket, may be eating up your filehandles.
just because wicket gets the exception doesnt mean its causing it. ask
your admin to list the files that are held open to see what they are.
and, yes, also upgrade to latest ver.
-igor
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Jeffrey Sc
http://wicketinaction.com/2008/10/creating-pluggable-applications-with-wicket-and-spring/
-igor
2011/3/4 Leszek Gawron :
> Hello,
>
> Let's say I want to write some UI to edit some complicated configuration
> split into multiple entities in multiple maven modules. The UI needs to have
> one entry
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:03 PM, devush wrote:
> Hi,
> I have following settings in web.xml
>
>
>myserv
>/app/*
>
>
>
> I expect that all requests such as:
> /app
> /app/abc
> /app/xyz
>
should come to the servlet. But only /app currently works.
>
> They actually come but since
Hi,
I have following settings in web.xml
myserv
/app/*
I expect that all requests such as:
/app
/app/abc
/app/xyz
should come to the servlet. But only /app currently works.
Moreover, I want to access the getRequestURL part from the servlet API
also, so that i can use the infor
Hi
User CheckGroup, Check and CheckGroupSelector components. See the
corresponding javadocs for details.
Josh.
2011/3/4 David MatouĊĦek
> Hi,
> I would like to add a "select all" checkbox to header of column in
> DefaultDataTable header. I extended AbstractColumn class, but couldn't add
> it to
I should have clarified.
Yea, if you have input fields with a dozen or so fields and you have 50%
disabled. But you are using the AbstractFormValidator validate() {
get("field1").getInput; get("field2").getInput ... And doing validation
checks, I guess this isn't a good approach.
I have to keep
(And whats wrong with Nabble ..its got this annoying Ajax interface) :(
Ugh!!!
-
Don't take life too seriously, your'e not getting out it alive anyway!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDown-replacing-text-field-tp3336347p3336427.html
Sent from th
Thanks...but curiosity : why wont that work in the first place?
-
Don't take life too seriously, your'e not getting out it alive anyway!
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/DropDown-replacing-text-field-tp3336347p3336426.html
Sent from the Users forum m
Use two s - one with inside, and one with
Swap the fragments
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Arjun Dhar wrote:
> Hi,
> i have a markup (Loop) for a couple of fields. Its a dynamic form and all
> the fields are text except one or two,
> Sample Markup:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Now in the Java
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3218
There is a thread in the mailing list. Search in Nabble.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> Hi
> Page#onInitialize is final in 1.5RC2
> i think this method ment to be overridden?
> am i missing something?
> Thanks
>
When you are in View mode then either your components are not form
components (e.g. is replaced with //...) or as you said
they are disabled. Form submit will not send name/value pair for disabled
form elements.
I think the first approach is better regarding user experience.
See visural's "view o
12 matches
Mail list logo