Updated and Still the Same Problem. =(
This is my BookmarkableLink:
linkNummer = new BookmarkablePageLink("link_nummer",
AngebotDetailsPage.class, new PageParameters(String.format("id=%d",
modelOfAngebot.getObject().getId())) );
and this my AjaxLink
AjaxLink showAngebotButton =
iam updating right now. i Reply again if i double checked my issue in the new
version.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Big-Problem-BookmarkablePageLinks-AjaxLinks-and-BackButton-tp3924428p3924456.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archi
this doesnt matter. i use the back-button on time (less than 2 seconds) and
the error appears.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Big-Problem-BookmarkablePageLinks-AjaxLinks-and-BackButton-tp3924428p3924451.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archi
1.4.8 is a very old version. Maybe try using the latest 1.4.x version
and see if the problem hasn't already been fixed.
>-Original Message-
>From: MattyDE [mailto:ufer.mar...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 5:37 PM
>To: users@wicket.apache.org
>Subject: Big Problem: BookmarkableP
This is very similar to what I am trying to do. Martin just replied to my post
with a great example. Check it out..
-Original Message-
From: "Chris Colman"
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:44:53
To:
Reply-To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Drilling Application.getHomePage()
We do someth
We do something similar but use
/content/value
Then you can mount the single page at "/content" and then treat what
follows as a parameter which determines how that page is rendered.
>-Original Message-
>From: Arjun Dhar [mailto:dhar...@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 5:20 PM
Thanks martin this is exactly what I was looking for.
-Original Message-
From: "Martin Grigorov-4 [via Apache Wicket]"
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:41:54
To: anantasthana
Subject: Re: Request mapping
Application#getHomePage() can be dynamic:
@Override
public Class getHomePage() {
if
Application#getHomePage() can be dynamic:
@Override
public Class getHomePage() {
if (MySession.get().isLoggedIn()) {
return AuthenticatedHomePage.class;
} else {
return NonAuthenticatedHomePage.class;
}
}
mountPage("/", NonAuthenticatedHomePage.class);
mountPage("/${userId}/hom
So how long after going to page2 are you hitting the back button? The page is
expired means that the session has been destroyed. You could possibly seT a
longer session time out in your webApplication
--Original Message--
From: MattyDE
To: users@wicket.apache.org
ReplyTo: users@wicket.ap
Hi community,
i have a big Problem:
In my application i use BookmarkabePageLinks to browse through different
Pages and AjaxLinks to Open a Div box for Example.
If the user now browse from Site A to B with the BookmarkablePageLink, use
than the back button of the Browser and now clicked a AjaxLi
Also I know with that I can do abc.com/users/user1
But would it work if I do
abc.com/users/user1/testimonials
Which means the testimonials page for user1? I know how to implement the first
scenario.. But I just can't figure out the second
-Original Message-
From: "Ernesto Reinaldo Barrei
Does it work with wicket 1.5 as well?? I know its there till 1.4v
-Original Message-
From: "Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro-4 [via Apache Wicket]"
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:28:31
To: anantasthana
Subject: Re: Request mapping
Anant,
Maybe you can use IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy to solve y
Anant,
Maybe you can use IndexedParamUrlCodingStrategy to solve your problem...?
Regards,
Ernesto
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:36 PM, anantasthana wrote:
> I am trying to map my requests in a special way to achieve a very simple
> purpose
>
> say the root website is abc.com and has several users
Ah, sorry was trying to use as less words as possible :)
Q / Problem) Since Application.getHomePage() returns Class
and in my case Multiple pages are mounted to point to the same WebPage. How
to I specify the Home Page.
In other words: CLASS to Mounted Pages is a one to many relation. By
returnin
I haven't tested other browsers but the problem is occurring for me on
FireFox 7.0.1.
>my application has same problem, but it only throw socket error when IE
6 -
>8
>brower, chrome and IE9 has no the problem.
>
>here is my question:
>http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-ModalWindo
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Arjun Dhar wrote:
> Hi,
> All my pages are generated dynamically in a particular project (including
> Home).
>
> Application.getHomePage() returns Class
>
> The trouble is that all my pages use the same WebPage class, based on the
> name in the URL it determines wh
Hi,
All my pages are generated dynamically in a particular project (including
Home).
Application.getHomePage() returns Class
The trouble is that all my pages use the same WebPage class, based on the
name in the URL it determines which content to fetch.
Example: http://mysite.org/abc
The strateg
my application has same problem, but it only throw socket error when IE 6 - 8
brower, chrome and IE9 has no the problem.
here is my question:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-there-ModalWindow-alternative-options-td3896443.html
i have test by wicket 1.5.2 take 2 version, the problem
Thank you for your quick replies!
I have been trying to set up a quickstart with wicket version 1.5.2 to test
things out, but it seems like its not totally trivial to set up security
constraints in web.xml using jetty. I tried to add the following to my
web.xml:
All res
I am trying to map my requests in a special way to achieve a very simple
purpose
say the root website is abc.com and has several users and each use has a
home page , admin page , requests page etc
let us asume we have uers user1 and user 2
i want the urls to be coded as
abc.com/user1/admin
abc
That looks pretty good. I too am attempting to build a RIA with ExtJS using
Wicket as my back-end. On first look it seems like the two should be a
great fit as both rely heavily on building a hierarchical tree of
components. If I could build a set of custom wicket components to output
javascript
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Entropy wrote:
> That looks pretty good. I too am attempting to build a RIA with ExtJS using
> Wicket as my back-end. On first look it seems like the two should be a
> great fit as both rely heavily on building a hierarchical tree of
> components. If I could bui
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Bruno Borges wrote:
> Can't upgrade... :-(
>
> Political issues (read: conservative corporation with terrible decision
> makers)
They let you use wicket, so they can't be too bad :)
Martijn
-
To
That looks pretty good. I too am attempting to build a RIA with ExtJS using
Wicket as my back-end. On first look it seems like the two should be a
great fit as both rely heavily on building a hierarchical tree of
components. If I could build a set of custom wicket components to output
javascript
>I still doesn't understand how wicket is able to know that the component is
>not visible in the browser.
We don't understand this either.
Could you create a quickstart?
Sven
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gaetan Zoritchak [mailto:g.zoritc...@moncoachfinance.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Gaetan Zoritchak
wrote:
> Thank you, It's working but the code is quite ugly (lot of duplication just
> to override the canCallListenerInterface() ).
>
> I still doesn't understand how wicket is able to know that the component is
> not visible in the browser.
Wicke
Thank you, It's working but the code is quite ugly (lot of duplication just
to override the canCallListenerInterface() ).
I still doesn't understand how wicket is able to know that the component is
not visible in the browser.
Furthermore, I find problematic the fact that the behavior depends on
t
Can't upgrade... :-(
Political issues (read: conservative corporation with terrible decision
makers)
*Bruno Borges*
(21) 7672-7099
*www.brunoborges.com*
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Bruno Borges
> wrote:
> > After playing with Nes
I have discovered that this only occurs when running our app inside
IntelliJ. When we run it in tomcat directly, outside any IDE, I can't
get the problem to occur. Hopefully the problem will not appear at all
when running on the production server.
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Colman [m
ooops, I was wrong. I got the same problem.
I also see this error on the specified page with Internet Explorer 8
(WinXP SP3)
It does not matter if I enable or disable the compatibility feature.
Matt
On 2011-10-20 13:54, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Works OK for me.
No JS errors. Tested with IE9 in
Another problem is that without ?3 if your user reloads the page (F5)
Wicket wont know which page instance to re-render and will create a
new instance of the page. I.e. the state will be lost.
In Wicket 1.4 ?wicket:interface=0:0:bla:1: is used to keep the page id.
If you don't want this special pa
Looks good for me also. Tested under IE 8, Windows XP.
Works OK for me.
No JS errors. Tested with IE9 in different browser modes and document
modes. Including Quirks.
Is it possible that it is some IE setting ?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Ann Baert wrote:
A wicket autocomplete gives error
I think redirect is performed as a solution to double post problem. You can
disable it from RequestCycleSetting by setting it to One Pass Render.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Илья Нарыжный wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please explain for what reason wicket for every page redirects
> users to
I also see this error on the specified page with Internet Explorer 8
(WinXP SP3)
It does not matter if I enable or disable the compatibility feature.
Matt
On 2011-10-20 13:54, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Works OK for me.
No JS errors. Tested with IE9 in different browser modes and document
modes. I
Works OK for me.
No JS errors. Tested with IE9 in different browser modes and document
modes. Including Quirks.
Is it possible that it is some IE setting ?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Ann Baert wrote:
> A wicket autocomplete gives errors in Internet Explorer. The error is on
> line 42 of wic
A wicket autocomplete gives errors in Internet Explorer. The error is on
line 42 of wicket-autocomplete.js.
On that line stands the following code: objonkeyup=obj.onkeyup;
I'm using Wicket 1.5.1. And you can reproduce the problem on the wicket
examples: http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-exampl
Hello,
Could you please explain for what reason wicket for every page redirects
users to some other page by 302 code?
For example from /home user will be redirected to /home?1 etc.
It seems quite strange and I think, that this is much more strange for
Search Engines.
I found solution how to optimi
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Bruno Borges wrote:
> After playing with Nested Forms in WIcket 1.4.18, I found out that the
> onSubmit method of these forms is called at the end of the process.
>
> If a parent form has a button and this button is submited, its onSubmit
> method is called before
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:57 AM, manuelbarzi wrote:
> may you follow something like this:
>
>
> public class AjaxTabbedPanel extends TabbedPanel
> {
>
> public AjaxTabbedPanel(String id, List tabs)
> {
> super(id, tabs);
> setOutputMarkupId(true);
>
>
may you follow something like this:
public class AjaxTabbedPanel extends TabbedPanel
{
public AjaxTabbedPanel(String id, List tabs)
{
super(id, tabs);
setOutputMarkupId(true);
setVersioned(false);
}
@Override
Hello,
is there a default way to determine when a user switches between tabs in an
AjaxTabbedPanel?
I see onAjaxUpdate(final AjaxRequestTarget target) but that is called after
the new tab has been set.
I would like to add a confirmation dialog before the new tab is set in case
the user had changed
There is an improvement in Wicket 1.5 to not allow execution of
invisible component or even worse on disabled behavior for security
reasons.
It is possible to extend AjaxEditableLabel and configure it to allow
such executions.
Override
org.apache.wicket.extensions.ajax.markup.html.AjaxEditableLab
So is it a bug or a regression (because it was working on W1.4)? Even, if
the event is fired when leaving the tab, I don't understand why the server
reacts differently. How can it knows that the component isn't visible
anymoree???
Should I drop all these widget from my app? We use them a lot in my
43 matches
Mail list logo
