Can anyone let me know about the entry in *Apache Wicket* /change log/ which
talks about serialization error fix?
-
//Maddy
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Regarding-Stack-Overflow-exception-tp4203930p4288315.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing
I think this is a bug of a wicket so I have added an extra validation to date
component when user clicks on submit button.
This is not the best solution but it is worked.
Any other solutions?
With my best regards.
Secil
-
Wicket-Java
--
View this message in context:
Hi again,
It worked with ..;jsessionid=43423?param1=value1...;
But now I want to do the same think when I use setResponsePage(my page).
So now I should use the programatically method that you said to override
respond method. But now I don't have a link.
Do you have idea wich class should I use?
Hi,
I have a web application that works on jetty, tomcat, jboss and glassfish
but has problems with websphere.
I found out that the problem is the use of filters
(org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter) so I switched to
WicketServlet but now, trying with jetty I have:
Either remove
init-param
param-nameapplicationFactoryClassName/param-name
param-valueorg.apache.wicket.spring.SpringWebApplicationFactory/param-value
/init-param
or add a bean for YourApplication in applicationContext.xml
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM,
Create a ticket please
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
I just checked with 1.5.x and for stateless pages all bookmarkable page
links do not incur the jsessionid suffix for a non cookie client. Once
an Ajax link is added to the page however the
I added a bean for my application in applicationContext.xml and now I don't
see any errors but when I try to access to my first page (a login page) I
see a window listing:
META-INF/ 0 bytes 2-gen-2012 16.46.08
WEB-INF/0 bytes 11-gen-2012 15.21.18
css/0 bytes
for packaged resources we should not be adding jsessionid i dont think...
-igor
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Create a ticket please
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
I just checked with 1.5.x
Hello everyone,
first, sorry for the bad subject. I didn't know how to describe this
problem in a short line.
I have a page with a form with two AjaxButtons (Add and Delete) and an
AjaxFallbackDefaultDataTable. The first button opens a ModalWindow with
another form to add new entries to the
I was trying to understand the wicket serialize method call.
Does it serialize the entire form? Does it serialize fields that are
NOT blank?
I noticed that sometimes post body content only contains the field that
I clicked on and then other times it looks like all of the elements on
the form
Yes, I have vague memories of this issue coming up a long time ago in 1.4.x and
at the time I thought it was dealt with but maybe there was a problem with its
implementation or maybe it regressed somehow.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com]
Sent:
i remember this being fixed in 1.5 after the resource refactor...
-igor
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Chris Colman
chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com wrote:
Yes, I have vague memories of this issue coming up a long time ago in 1.4.x
and at the time I thought it was dealt with but maybe there
I ran a quickstart with a very simple standard link and an AJAX link on a page
and using yesterday's 1.5-x HEAD.
The .js resources included in the head all had the jsessionid suffix on the
first hit from the browser.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg
I have an application which needs to accept a POST request from an
outside server, to confirm payment. I don't want to break the default
wicket render strategy (REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER) which is serving to give the
users a nicer experience than ONE_PASS_RENDER would, however, the
external service
CheckGroupSelector is very useful to select all/none, but I found there is
one condition that the behavior of CheckGroupSelector becomes strange. I'm
not sure whether it's a bug or not.
When the CheckGroup contains more than two check items, it's fine for any
function.
But when it contains only
WICKET-4279 ?
Am 13.01.2012 05:32, schrieb rolandpeng:
CheckGroupSelector is very useful to select all/none, but I found there is
one condition that the behavior of CheckGroupSelector becomes strange. I'm
not sure whether it's a bug or not.
When the CheckGroup contains more than two check
16 matches
Mail list logo