I have a custom behavior that contributes Javascript to the header. In order
to prevent collisions with other components that may also be using that
behavior, I include it using TextTemplateHeaderContributor. Like so:
public class CustomBehavior extends AbstractBehavior {
private Component
create a jira issue for this
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Joel Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm doing some component-based authorization and I'm trying to disable an
> entire RadioGroup without having to tie the authorization to each individual
> R
I'm doing some component-based authorization and I'm trying to disable an
entire RadioGroup without having to tie the authorization to each individual
Radio button. Were I to directly disable the RadioGroup, it looks like the
Radio buttons would also disable (but I haven't tested this); but it
I'm trying to prevent the double submit problem, where the user clicks the
submit button more than once causing a double post.
I tried implementing the soluion suggested here:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-double-form-submission-handling---p13850262.html
The problem is if there's a validation err
I'm trying to implement a popup (via floating DIV) that triggers on an
onmouseover event. Sort of like a tooltip, but with more content. I wanted to
implement this as a behavior so the component with the mouse event (and the
associated markup file) didn't need to have any special knowledge of
I'm trying to use AjaxFormSubmitBehavior, and in the ajax debug I'm
getting:
ERROR: Received Ajax response with code: 404
Anyone know what this means? Nothing in the logs indicates a problem,
but maybe I'm not using AjaxFormSubmitBehavior properly. I'm trying to
wicketify a javascript-based cal
Would the fact that wicket now uses a filter instead of a servlet have
an effect on trying to forward a request. I'm trying to forward a
request from the jsp/servlet portion of our app to a bookmarkable wicket
page using RequestDispatcher.forward(), but no matter what sort of path
I send it, I get
> This way you end up not using compression at all? I would be interested in a
> solution which would help me to use the compression without any problems.
Now I'm just using wicket's default compression (which I didn't know existed
before this problem arose).
> Maybe someone from the wicket cor
filter doesn't check if the content is
already compressed. But it should, because we set the correct headers.
-Matej
On 7/27/07, Joel Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using IHeaderContributor to include dynamic Javascript; however,
> wicket-event.js is returning to th
I'm using IHeaderContributor to include dynamic Javascript; however,
wicket-event.js is returning to the browser as unreadable garbage. I
think it MAY have something to do with compression. Our app uses a
home-grown compression filter, and I also read today that wicket uses
default compression to
10 matches
Mail list logo
