Casper, for the case when you can not enforce your users to have
javascript, it's more worthwhile to compare Wicket to Tapestry5.
I'm evaluating the latter right now.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Casper Bang cas...@jbr.dk wrote:
I was just wondering about the Wicket community's opinion of
Hi,
Is it correct that there is no stateless AjaxFallbackLink alternative?
Which can pass through parameters?
If so I would probably implement one if it's not very hard. Could you
give good advises on this? Directions, approaches and so on.
Right now I think first I have to study
Hi,
What are pros and cons of using wicket:border + wicket:body VS
wicket:extend + wicket:child?
Is the first case just about avoiding wicket:xxx tags in real pages?
Consider java/org/apache/wicket/examples/navomatic example, I omit
the related java code for brevity:
NavomaticBorder.html:
As I understand there are a lot of wicket users from all around the world.
What about scheduled video podcasts?
They are much more affordable for everyone.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
Hi Andreas,
Well, may be my question is silly, but:
What about making dao a local variable in your component handlers?
Then you can get rid of that serializing-deserializing of dao as a
Component member.
Does this approach have too much overhead? Does it make some things impossible?
Cheers,
Yes, I mean something like this, with injector initialized in WebApplication.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Martin Grigorov mcgreg...@e-card.bg wrote:
I have seen such code somewhere:
public class myLDM extends LoadableDetachableModel {
transient @SpringBean myDAO;
public Object load()
Kiev, Ukraine. Just studying wicket yet.
BTW, is it easy to control what wicket stores in session? May be by patching
wicket code?
P.S. Sorry if the question is lame, I have just started studying wicket and
I want to decide whether to use it in production.
When profiling the application server, we found out that there are HTTP
