Hi,
I notice that the core devs have to ask PR submitters to close their
PRs on github:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/101
I am curious: Why is that so?
Looking here:
https://help.github.com/articles/permission-levels-for-an-organization-repository/
I assume the wicket core devs are
Hi,
Already in Wicket there is GenericPanel, GenericWebPage,
GenericFragment, IGenericComponent, and IModel of course is already
generic.
But there is still IBehavior without Generics and several standard
components which do not implement IGenericComponent such a Label.
Are there plans to
).
The main stopper is that using generics makes the code even more verbose.
And many people don't like this.
So there are few Generic*** versions of the most used components.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Thibault Kruse
Hi,
we have a page with several components (after logging in, the user
sees a dashboard page with panels offering information from diverse
sources).
We would like to achieve that if one of the component fails to render,
this does not take down the whole page.
So the failing component should
Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Thibault Kruse tibokr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
we have a page for some resource mounted at /resource/id
When users enter an invalid ID, we want to render a 404 page.
However, we would like the resulting
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Thibault Kruse tibokr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
As a follow-up: How can the Http Error code then be checked using
WicketTester?
Currently, after your suggested change, the browser shows my 404 page
and status is 404, but in WicketTester, I get
In MyPage.java
.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Thibault Kruse
tibokr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
As a follow-up: How can the Http Error code then be checked using
WicketTester?
Currently, after your suggested change
Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Thibault Kruse tibokr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Sorry I just realized I pasted something wrong in my last message. My
current workaround would be:
assertThat(TESTER_SCOPE.getTester().getPreviousResponses
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Garret Wilson gar...@globalmentor.com wrote:
I'm not denying that versioned pages may be a useful concept for some use
cases (even though I can't think of any offhand). I'm just saying it's not
my use case, and I had assumed throughout development on our project
versions of pages) becomes
relevant.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
Thibault,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Thibault Kruse tibokr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Garret Wilson gar...@globalmentor.com
wrote:
I'm
You could generally tune down on telling the world about your
emotional state on technical mailing lists, your emotional state is of
no significant interest to the people who registered to this mailing
list, at least no in the amount you provide. We got it the first time.
And e.g. your phrasing
It is an interesting question whether other web frameworks (also
outside JVM world) use any similar page versioning scheme to wicket. I
am not aware of any.
In any case I guess most projects using wicket would have to make
design decisions based on whether the page version is acceptable in
the
bump, any opinion? Should I open a JIRA?
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Thibault Kruse
tibokr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
is it intentional that if a class directly extends MarkupContainer,
but does not have any children, then its associated markup is not
rendered?
When using
public
?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Thibault Kruse
tibokr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Sorry, this was wicket 1.6.16 and 1.6.17.
Here is a quickstart, to reproduce both cases some comments have to be
switched:
https://github.com/tkruse/custommarkup
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Sven Meier s
, Thibault Kruse
tibokr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Regarding the markupException, the example I posted was flawed, must
be: return Markup.of(wicket:panelit works/wicket:panel);
But that is not relevant to my report. The example on github had this fixed.
Any other ideas / somewhat clean workaround
the result is being discarded.
That seems like design smell. If users override getMarkup() with some
expensive operation, they should be able to rely on this being called
just once, and this only if the result is actually being used.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Thibault Kruse
tibokr
;
body
wicket:panel
Fallback works!
/wicket:panel
/body
/html
So I guess I am still doing something wrong here.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Thibault Kruse
tibokr...@googlemail.com wrote:
So, I have a working solution like this:
public class CustomMarkupFallbackMarkupContainer
) {
return null;
}
}
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Thibault Kruse
tibokr...@googlemail.com wrote:
I forgot to mention, for my solution to work, the associated markup
file must not have tags outside the wicket:panel tags:
wicket:panel
Fallback works!
/wicket:panel
as opposed
Hi,
is it intentional that if a class directly extends MarkupContainer,
but does not have any children, then its associated markup is not
rendered?
When using
public class FooMarkupContainer extends MarkupContainer implements
IMarkupCacheKeyProvider {
public FooMarkupContainer(String id)
Hi,
I am trying to create a wicket panel that renders markup from some
remote source, but if fetching fails, renders some fallback markup. I
want to achieve this with minimal code.
I tried two approaches one based on overriding getMarkup(), one based
on
to a MarkupException here with Wicket 1.6.x.
Regards
Sven
On 09/15/2014 07:37 PM, Thibault Kruse wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create a wicket panel that renders markup from some
remote source, but if fetching fails, renders some fallback markup. I
want to achieve this with minimal code.
I tried two
Hi,
we have a page for some resource mounted at /resource/id
When users enter an invalid ID, we want to render a 404 page.
However, we would like the resulting page not have the original url
with the invalid id (but http status 404).
Is there any obvious easy way to achieve this? Because it
at 10:45 AM, Thibault Kruse tibokr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hm, thinking some more, the general solution would be to fail if a
variant is requested, and it is among a set of whitelisted variants,
and the markup is not found. For other variants, using the default
would probably be fine
in a file.
Or you can use org.apache.wicket.util.tester.WicketTester#assertContains()
to check that a specific String (actually a Regex) is in the response.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Thibault Kruse tibokr
, Thibault Kruse tibokr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Both solutions are not ideal, since we do not want our tests to become
brittle. We want to functionally test components in multiple variants,
but where the variants vary in mere layout (css classes), we do not
want to have tests break just because
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Thibault Kruse tibokr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi,
playing around with Variants for Components, I am wondering whether
there is an elegant way to steer Variant markup loading via a
Behavior
Hi,
playing around with Variants for Components, I am wondering whether
there is an elegant way to steer Variant markup loading via a
Behavior.
In our case we want to use a different markup layout based on the
width of the container the component is going to be used in, visually.
So if we
Hi all,
I suggest a breaking change to wicketstuff-shiro here:
https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/issues/328
In brief: wicketstuffshiro allows to use @ShiroSecurityConstraint or
@ShiroSecurityConstraints (with s at the end) annotations on Component
classes to trigger security checks at
28 matches
Mail list logo
