oh the irony!
-igor
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1382
> Funny, it was you who asked for this feature :-)
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> because it cha
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1382
Funny, it was you who asked for this feature :-)
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> because it changes references. So it does need to be repainted. Problem are
> with the anticache paramete
because it changes references. So it does need to be repainted. Problem are
with the anticache parameter we are forcing the browser to download the
image again instead of pulling it from browser cache. That makes it
flicker...
2011/3/15 Martin Grigorov
> Why do you put the image in the AjaxReque
Why do you put the image in the AjaxRequestTarget if you don't want to
repaint it ?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I had a problem where Image always added the anticache on ajax calls, in my
> case we actually wanted the picture
Hi
I had a problem where Image always added the anticache on ajax calls, in my
case we actually wanted the pictures to be read from cache (that way we can
avoid flickering). However it is not possible with Image to specify that you
do not want the anti cache appended.. Could we either have an opti
