View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/AJAX-slower-than-full-page-update-tp17620961p27990814.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apac
the full page withou AJAX. For example AJAX sorting a big
>>>> DataTable
>>>> (10x25) can be much slower that without AJAX, and I often see "Client
>>>> parsetime" of more than a second in IE.
>>>> FireFox seems
full page withou AJAX. For example AJAX sorting a big
>>> DataTable
>>> (10x25) can be much slower that without AJAX, and I often see "Client
>>> parsetime" of more than a second in IE.
>>> FireFox seems to be faster, so I am hoping that is is possible to
&
ble to
>> optimize
>> the Wicket AJAX Javascript.
>>
>> Is this somthing that you Wicket developers will look into?
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Niels
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/AJAX-slower-than-full-pa
in IE.
> FireFox seems to be faster, so I am hoping that is is possible to optimize
> the Wicket AJAX Javascript.
>
> Is this somthing that you Wicket developers will look into?
>
> Best Regards
> Niels
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/AJAX
eFox seems to be faster, so I am hoping that is is possible to optimize
the Wicket AJAX Javascript.
Is this somthing that you Wicket developers will look into?
Best Regards
Niels
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AJAX-slower-than-full-page-update-tp17620961p17620961.html
Sen
