Hi Richard, that seems a very good idea, thank you, didn´t come into my mind... *d0h* ;)
Regards Markus -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: richardwilko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 19. September 2008 15:17 An: users@wicket.apache.org Betreff: Re: Ajax-only-Form? In that case use an ajax submit link rather than a button (which uses a href and an onclick), with no button in the form. However I dont think this will stop the enter key from submitting the form... You could also try lazy loading the form with ajax, that way you can be sure that if they see the form they have javascript enabled, actually this is probably the best way of doing it. Cheers, Richard Markus-66 wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > thank you for your answer. But my Problem is, I want to "cut out" the > people > with JavaScript deactivated because they cannot use the > GoogleMaps-functionality, what makes it kinda useless to submit the form. > Your prototype-approach won´t work that way. > > Perhaps I only add a warning-div on the top and do nothing. Any further > ideas would be appreaciated. > > Regards > Markus > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: richardwilko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. September 2008 15:01 > An: users@wicket.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Ajax-only-Form? > > > So if im understanding correctly your form is submitting in the non-ajax > standard way when you press return on the input field? > > If so then this is my solution: > > http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/05/how-to-stop-non-ajax-form-subm > its-in-wicket/ > > Hope it helps, > > Richard > > > > Markus-66 wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I have an issue with a Form I want only to be available to users with >> Javascript turned on, so I used a AjaxButton, and set DefaultButton to >> the >> AjaxButton. >> >> But the Form still submits using 'Return' - rendering the Body only also >> kills the AjaxButton. Can anyone help me how to achieve this? Hiding the >> Button and appending a onchange-event to the first input-field is in my >> opinion a very bad way of doing it. Also "in-page" javascripting seems >> not >> so nice. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Markus >> >> >> > > > ----- > http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk My blog: > http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-only-Form--tp19569839p19571913.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ----- http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk My blog: http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-only-Form--tp19569839p19572180.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
