Re: Announcement: Annotation-based Mounting of Resources

2009-12-22 Thread sfussenegger
Hi James, Sorry for the late response. I would personally say: no, it isn't saving that much. I use these "few helper methods" that are also part of the project. However, some people requested support for annotations and like using it. Additionally, it fits pretty well with wicketstuff-annotation

Re: Announcement: Annotation-based Mounting of Resources

2009-12-02 Thread James Carman
Is this annotation-based approach really saving that much? It seems to me that a few helper methods would do just as well. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Toscano wrote: > > Hi again, > > First of all, thank you for your time and dedication with this project, I > think is really useful and inter

Re: Announcement: Annotation-based Mounting of Resources

2009-12-01 Thread Toscano
Hi again, First of all, thank you for your time and dedication with this project, I think is really useful and interesting. I just can't have it working and I don't know the reason, I would really appreciate if you can spend a few minutes trying to help me if you don't mind. I'm using Wicket 1.

Re: Announcement: Annotation-based Mounting of Resources

2009-10-14 Thread sfussenegger
Actually, it's even easier, just do ResourceMount m = new ResourceMount().setMerged(false); ResourceMount.mountAnnotatedPackageResources("/files", "com.example.components", this, mount); sfussenegger wrote: > > Actually, wicketstuff-annotation (and spring-core) is a dependency of > wicketstuff

Re: Announcement: Annotation-based Mounting of Resources

2009-10-14 Thread sfussenegger
Actually, wicketstuff-annotation (and spring-core) is a dependency of wicketstuff-merged-resources. I know, it doesn't feel quite right to include spring-core if you don't need it. As an idea, you could just package the required classes into a small jar file and exclude spring-core. You may disab

Re: Announcement: Annotation-based Mounting of Resources

2009-10-14 Thread Robin Sander
Hi Stefan. this sounds really interesting! As I see that you don't use Spring to parse your annoations, are there any plans to combine parts of your work with wicketstuff-annotation? Because I would like to use @MountPath from wicketstuff-annotation as well but not for the price of adding Sp

Announcement: Annotation-based Mounting of Resources

2009-10-14 Thread Stefan Fussenegger
Today, I’m happy to announce the availability of annotation-based mounting and merging of resources in wicketstuff-merged-resources (version 3.0-SNAPSHOT for Wicket 1.4, version 2.1-SNAPSHOT for Wicket 1.3). In order to mount resources, all that’s needed is adding annotations to component class