Auth-roles has always worked fine for me.
On Dec 9, 2011 10:59 AM, "Dan Alvizu" wrote:
> Ah, thanks for the info!
>
> @Other Dan: I poorly worded that. Role-based access is exactly what I want
> to do.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Emond Papegaaij
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > As
Ah, thanks for the info!
@Other Dan: I poorly worded that. Role-based access is exactly what I want
to do.
-Dan
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Emond Papegaaij
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of
> wicketstuff-core
> and as such is released for eve
Hi Dan,
As Martin stated, wicket-security (wasp-swarm) is now part of wicketstuff-core
and as such is released for every wicket release. It is maintained and it will
continue to work, as all our major applications are built on top of it.
Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij
On Friday 09 December 2011
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Dan Alvizu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not want
> users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they have. I
> think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained anymore? I
> can't
Hi, Dan. Can you clarify the requirements of your application? If users'
access are not based on their roles, then what are they based on?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Dan Alvizu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not want
> users to have acces
Hi,
I'm trying to solve an authorization problem in wicket 1.5 -- I do not want
users to have access to certain pages based on the roles that they have. I
think wasp-swarm may be what I need, but is it being maintained anymore? I
can't find anything current on the web since the 1.4.1 announcement.
