An advantage could be that cayenne is supported as a default persistent
solution.
There is not much magic in using Cayenne with Wicket. It depends on your
needs, but basically this is all you need:
public class DataObjectModel implements IModelCayenneDataObject
Cheers,
Adrian
Apache Click is very similar to Wicket:
http://incubator.apache.org/click/
What are the main differences and advantages?
regards
giovanni
Hi!
I guess click comes with its own layout.. like Vaadin
http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/
**
Martin
2010/1/29 Giovanni pino_o...@yahoo.com:
Apache Click is very similar to Wicket:
http://incubator.apache.org/click/
What are the main differences and advantages?
regards
giovanni
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Click
Hi!
I guess click comes with its own layout.. like Vaadin
http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/
**
Martin
2010/1/29 Giovanni pino_o...@yahoo.com:
Apache Click is very similar to Wicket:
http://incubator.apache.org/click/
What are the main differences
here provide a good look css for the wicket? I think wicket
with a good look css can beat them.
Regards!
Jing
-Original Message-
From: Martin Makundi [mailto:martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com]
Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:14
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Click
Hi
I looked at click. Its not just HTML and just java like wicket. Lack of
documentation and books and less widgets.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Giovanni pino_o...@yahoo.com wrote:
Apache Click is very similar to Wicket:
http://incubator.apache.org/click/
What are the main differences
