4, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Loritsch, Berin C.
wrote:
> Understood. Just introducing it as a possibility.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Carman [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 3:40 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: R
Understood. Just introducing it as a possibility.
-Original Message-
From: James Carman [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 3:40 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can @SpringBeans be optional?
That's not a dependency injection thing. I
any issues
> from the ApplicationContext not being set up in time during unit
> testing.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony DePalma [mailto:fatef...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:47 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Can @SpringBeans be o
Since it allows for lazy initialization, it also addresses any issues
from the ApplicationContext not being set up in time during unit
testing.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony DePalma [mailto:fatef...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:47 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Can
Define a getter for your service that returns null by default, and in
your Spring enabled session return the injected bean.
Martijn
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Anthony DePalma wrote:
> Often with spring I give some of my services extra features if they are
> configured in the xml for it, b
not right now. you can always file an rfe to add something like
@SpringBean(optional=true)
-igor
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Anthony DePalma wrote:
> Often with spring I give some of my services extra features if they are
> configured in the xml for it, but otherwise if they are null they a
Often with spring I give some of my services extra features if they are
configured in the xml for it, but otherwise if they are null they are simply
ignored. I'm running into an issue with my websession, that one of my apps
can use the RememberMeService but another cannot. However, I'd like to have
