good to know. i completely ignored this :)
francisco
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Class< ? extends Enum< ? >> enumClass;
> enumClass.getEnumConstants();
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Cédric Thiébault
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Yeah, check out:
https://wicketopia.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicketopia/trunk/wicketopia/src/main/java/org/wicketopia/component/choice/EnumDropDownChoice.java
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Class< ? extends Enum< ? >> enumClass;
> enumClass.getEnum
Class< ? extends Enum< ? >> enumClass;
enumClass.getEnumConstants();
-igor
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Cédric Thiébault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the input... I've updated my code :)
>
> James, I have the same question as Francisco: how do you get the
> values from the class of
Thanks for the input... I've updated my code :)
James, I have the same question as Francisco: how do you get the
values from the class of an enum?
Cedric
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:57 PM, francisco treacy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * i meant enum class
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:51 PM, fran
* i meant enum class
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:51 PM, francisco treacy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, you could have a varargs feature so that users could specify
>> exactly what they want without having to instantiate an array.
>
> yes, of course there is place for improvements...
> public E
> Also, you could have a varargs feature so that users could specify
> exactly what they want without having to instantiate an array.
yes, of course there is place for improvements...
public EnumCheckGroup(String id, T... values)
>> Why not just pass the enum class into the constructor?
if i pas
Also, you could have a varargs feature so that users could specify
exactly what they want without having to instantiate an array.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:15 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not just pass the enum class into the constructor? But, also have
> one that allows you
Why not just pass the enum class into the constructor? But, also have
one that allows you to provide a subset of enum values (as you already
have).
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:43 PM, francisco treacy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm sorry i didn't see this post before-- i came up with a solution a
i'm sorry i didn't see this post before-- i came up with a solution a
couple of weeks ago.
i called it EnumCheckGroup (that is, i went for CheckGroup rather than
CheckBox).
usage:
for a given enum:
public static enum Niveau {
etage, mezzanine, sous_sol;
}
Thanks Igor, it was exactly what i needed :-)
To complete this post, here is the solution I found :
http://surunairdejava.blogspot.com/2008/09/wicket-checkbox-abstractcheckboxmodel.html
Sorry it's in french but the code is easy to understand...
Cedric
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Igor Vayn
see abstractcheckboxmodel
-igor
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Cédric Thiébault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use a checkbox to set an enum value on my form object
> but I always get a type mismatch error (boolean is not an enum and
> vice versa).
>
> My form object has an
Hi,
I'm trying to use a checkbox to set an enum value on my form object
but I always get a type mismatch error (boolean is not an enum and
vice versa).
My form object has an enum and I want to display a list of checkboxes
to allow the user to select the value.
I don't want to use a radio because
12 matches
Mail list logo
