t;> equivalent of the two derived classes and pass those in to my BaseClass,
>>> but
>>> the derived classes are simpler.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> DC
>>>
>>> -
>>>
---
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-m
if your DerivedClass1.java does not have markup and your
BaseClass.html does not have a wicket:child tag then DerivedClass1
will use BaseClass' markup. so it should already work as you want,
just remove wicket:child tag.
-igor
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:13 AM, DCarr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it pos
Hi,
Is it possible to have class inheritance without markup inheritance?
I would like a wicket-aware base class (with an associated markup
file) with derived classes supplying data (e.g.. BaseClass with an
'abstract protected String getName()') and no markup files (or XML
files). I k
