Hi all,
whats the meaning of generic T on DataTables vs T of IColumn and T of
ICellPopulator?
As I understand its the type of object shown by the table rows.
Reading the javadoc of AbstractColumn it says T (if I understand
correct), its the type of object shown by the cell itself.
But DataT
Hi,
generic T is identical for the DataTable, and it's IColumns: it's the
type of the row models.
A column is responsible to provide a cell component for a row: For
DataTable only the input (e.g. Person) is interesting, the output
(Location) doesn't matter.
Your LocationColumn should exten
Hi Sven,
thanx for feedback.
Ok, how to implement the LocationColumn more reusable?
I dont want to be bound to a Datatable of Persons.
I'd like to have a Column which works with a Locations, independently
from which model-object the expression fetches the Location.
Is there any way to do that
Hi Patrick,
you can let your column implementation be generic:
public class LocationColumn extends PropertyColumn {
public LocationColumn(String expressionToLocation){
super(Model.of("Location"), expressionToLocation);
}
@Override
public vo
Hi Sven,
I did already implement it this way... and its working.
But my team members asked (more the client developers point of view),
why the column-class itself is not a generic of Location, like this.
public class LocationColumn extends PropertyColumn {
...
}
At the current implementation
Hi,
>At the current implementation they need to do
>cols.add(new LocationColum(...));
>instead of just
>cols.add(new LocationColum(...));
I think you mean LocationColumn.
>nice feature of PropertyColums: Not to have a too strength coupling of
what the column displays in the cell and what the d
