application init should be fine.
-igor
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:02 AM, A. Maza wrote:
> Thanks Igor,
>
>
> I have seen that the Objects class provides a static setter in order to use
> a different Implementation of IObjectStreamFactory instead of the
> DefaultObjectStreamFactory.
>
> Where would
Thanks Igor,
I have seen that the Objects class provides a static setter in order to
use a different Implementation of IObjectStreamFactory instead of the
DefaultObjectStreamFactory.
Where would you recommend to place the code to set my own implementation
of IObjectStreamFactory using the s
that should most likely work without problems.
-igor
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Andreas Maza wrote:
> just to circumvent the problem for a while, I am thinking of the following
> workaround:
>
> what would be the implications if I change the implementation of
> IObjectStreamFactor.DefaultOb
just to circumvent the problem for a while, I am thinking of the
following workaround:
what would be the implications if I change the implementation of
IObjectStreamFactor.DefaultObjectStreamFactory so that
newObjectInputStream() and newObjectOutputStream return the regular JDK
ObjectInputSt
