On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Hi!
its not about the list *items* its about the components you add to them
onpopuateitem(item item) {
add(new label(name));
add(new label(email));
}
wont work
Why should it? Won't make it any
On Nov 5, 2010, at 3:01 PM, Martin Makundi wrote:
Duh.. I think there can be _no_ excuse to not reduce manual work where
it is really not needed. It's not like we are talking about airline
autopilots here.
So we don't need Wicket to work predictably and reliably all the time?
MTBF is a
because the designer delivers only part of the solution - the markup.
I meant software designer.
div wicket:id=for-admins-only
div wicket:id=salary/div
!-- a bunch of other components --
/div
now the developer takes the salary div and moves it out of the
for-admins-only div. guess
Duh.. I think there can be _no_ excuse to not reduce manual work where
it is really not needed. It's not like we are talking about airline
autopilots here.
So we don't need Wicket to work predictably and reliably all the time?
We are only proposing a new way of doing things faster with equal
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
because the designer delivers only part of the solution - the markup.
I meant software designer.
div wicket:id=for-admins-only
div wicket:id=salary/div
!-- a bunch of other components --
/div
now
On Nov 5, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Martin Makundi wrote:
We will provide a patch if possible. However, we might need some help
onto our endevor.
If it's not possible, why would you expect someone else to do it? Step up and
make it happen! Avoid the misunderstandings, show what it should do!
If
div wicket:id=for-admins-only
div wicket:id=salary/div
!-- a bunch of other components --
/div
now the developer takes the salary div and moves it out of the
for-admins-only div. guess what, your *designer* has just opened a
huge security hole in your application. who would use wicket if
We will provide a patch if possible. However, we might need some help
onto our endevor.
If it's not possible, why would you expect someone else to do it?
Step up and make it happen! Avoid the misunderstandings, show what it should
do!
If you are demonstrating progress on something that
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
We will provide a patch if possible. However, we might need some help
onto our endevor.
If it's not possible, why would you expect someone else to do it?
Step up and make it happen! Avoid the
I propose Free Wicket from component-hierarchy hell
We have discussd before that Wicket has unnecessary binding to
wicket:id and component hierarchy
[http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg53941.html].
I think I found a simple solution: wicket:id should be allowed to be
on any
nice.
On 11/4/10 1:13 PM, Martin Makundi wrote:
I propose Free Wicket from component-hierarchy hell
We have discussd before that Wicket has unnecessary binding to
wicket:id and component hierarchy
[http://www.mail-archive.com/users@wicket.apache.org/msg53941.html].
I think I found a simple
-from-component-hierarchy-hell-tp3027705p3027881.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h
hierarchies to be hell, you probably aren't
using Wicket right. Break things down into small reusable chunks using
Panels and you will find everything gets much, much easier.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-wicket-from-component-hierarchy-hell
in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Free-wicket-from-component-hierarchy-hell-tp3027705p3027881.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Martin Makundi
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com wrote:
Can you see the matrix?
;)
If you have:
html
form wicket:id=form
input wicket:id=input .../
/form
/html
public class MyPage extends WebPage {
public MyPage () {
add(new
201 - 215 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
