Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-16 Thread Suraj Chandran
Thanks a lot for all your input. Thanks, Suraj. On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > My aim would be to push requests towards statelessness as much as > possible. > > Noticing this some guys have told me that "maybe wicket is not for this". > > Considering that atleast 20%

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-15 Thread Eelco Hillenius
> My aim would be to push requests towards statelessness as much as possible. > Noticing this some guys have told me that "maybe wicket is not for this". > Considering that atleast 20% of the requests will be session based, do you > suggest using wicket. You should also consider why you want to us

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-15 Thread Jonathan Locke
ot be worrying about this at all if it were my project. The key is, as always: *DO NOT* PREMATURELY OPTIMIZE! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-wicket-suited-for-my-needs-tp3305543p3307434.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-15 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Suraj Chandran wrote: > 10K concurrent sessions. That really is not a problem IMO. If you have a 2GB heap: you probably should reserve 1GB for request processing, and 1GB for session/cache/etc storage. However, memory is not that expensive anymore, and it is fair

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Suraj Chandran
10K concurrent sessions. Thanks, Suraj. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
As Jonathan asked, did you really mean 10k concurrent *requests* (which is what you stated originally), or did you mean 10k concurrent *sessions*? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org* On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Suraj Chandra

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Suraj Chandran
I understand that wicket is a stateful session based framework, but there is still provision for stateless stuff. My aim would be to push requests towards statelessness as much as possible. Noticing this some guys have told me that "maybe wicket is not for this". Considering that atleast 20% of t

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Jonathan Locke
10K concurrent *requests* or sessions? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-wicket-suited-for-my-needs-tp3305543p3306071.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Suraj Chandran
Hi guys, I have just started with wicket and I have started loving it. But I am afraid whether wicket suits my needs. 1) We are working on a website that will serve free and legal music. So basically the whole purpose of the site is to serve content with all the boiler plate like "Search", "Profi