public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
insideDialogBox.open(target);
}
};
add(linkToOpenDialog);
Again, thank you SO much for taking the time to help me out! It's greatly
appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.18429
wrote:
> Good afternoon everybody!
>
> Can one point a dialog in JQWicket to an external URL (or just in Wicket in
> general..)? E.g. can I have a link that opens a modal dialog showing
> "https://www.google.com/"; in it, or something like that?
>
> I keep seeing this ex
Good afternoon everybody!
Can one point a dialog in JQWicket to an external URL (or just in Wicket in
general..)? E.g. can I have a link that opens a modal dialog showing
"https://www.google.com/"; in it, or something like that?
I keep seeing this example over and over, but it's t
In a wicket web page I'm using a ListView to display objects and in a each
line
of this component there is a link to open a PrettyPopin Modal Window to
edit an object.
The problem is that on submit event the Modal Window doesn't returns to
parent or original page and its reloaded.
First is showe
hi lorenzo,
I have a problem with JQWicket because simple Example don't work
I insert in application:
@Override
protected void init() {
super.init();
getComponentPreOnBeforeRenderListeners().add(new
JQComponentOnBeforeRenderListener());
}
in my homePage.java:
Point 2 is connected with this issue
http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/issues/detail?id=38
I've downloaded sources and applied patch (it seems that project is no more
developed) and it helped, but framework did not work correctly due to conflicts
with my custom jQuery.
Switching back t
Hi,
Jqwicket has several components that I would like to use (CKEditor,
MaskedInput, maybe later other), but I see some issues:
1. Is there an option to use jqwicket components (maybe other project?)
without incorporating/integrating jqwicket jquery?
If not, then:
2. When I want
The current version on wiquery uses an older jquery version than does
Wicket 6.3.0 which was causing issues for us.
N
On Nov 28, 2012 1:23 PM, "vishal" wrote:
> Hi Folks - has there been any progress on JQWicket for Wicket 6.0? I am
> unable to upgrade to Wicket 6.3 because I
Hi Folks - has there been any progress on JQWicket for Wicket 6.0? I am
unable to upgrade to Wicket 6.3 because I am using several JQWicket
components. I would like to avoid switching over to Wi-Query since our
system is in production and it will have widespread impact at this time.
--
View
Excellent! Thank you, everybody!
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, mk wrote:
> I've started Wicket 6 migration, check the SCM. Plan to release next
> JQWicket
> version after Wicket 6 final is available.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apa
I've started Wicket 6 migration, check the SCM. Plan to release next JQWicket
version after Wicket 6 final is available.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jqwicket-tp4651665p4651754.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabbl
-jquery-ui-plugins, feel free to make a pull request ! :)
Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Decebal Suiu wrote:
> Hi
>
> In my opinion the main advantage of the jqwicket over
> wiquery/wicket-jquery-ui is the impressive list of jquery plugins (ui
&g
most cases trivial.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Decebal Suiu wrote:
> Hi
>
> In my opinion the main advantage of the jqwicket over
> wiquery/wicket-jquery-ui is the impressive list of jquery plugins (ui
> components). See http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/w/list for more
> de
Hi
In my opinion the main advantage of the jqwicket over
wiquery/wicket-jquery-ui is the impressive list of jquery plugins (ui
components). See http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/w/list for more details.
Of course, it's not difficult to accommodate these jquery components with
wiquery/w
Cheers, men!
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> https://github.com/WiQuery/wiquery and
> https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/ are migrated to Wicket 6
>
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Decebal Suiu wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On the jqwic
https://github.com/WiQuery/wiquery and
https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/ are migrated to Wicket 6
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Decebal Suiu wrote:
> Hi
>
> On the jqwicket forum on Jul 14 I posted a simple question about "jqwicket
> and wicket 6.0". No respon
Hi
On the jqwicket forum on Jul 14 I posted a simple question about "jqwicket
and wicket 6.0". No response. The last commit on svn was on 30 Dec 2011.
Good luck :)
Best regards,
Decebal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Jqwicket-tp46516
Wicket 6.0 has jQuery support by its own.
2012/8/30 Pierre Goupil
> Good evening,
>
> I have two simple questions regarding jqwicket:
>
> - are there any plans for Wicket 6.0? Or even a work in progress?
>
> - does it have a Git repository? Or is it just using SVN?
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre
>
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/JQWicket-BlockUIBehavior-does-not-work-after-target-addComponent-tp4372781p4372781.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubs
: Wiquery and JQWicket crash each other
I got answer from Wiquey developer :
"Hi!
JQWicket and WiQuery do not work well together. Both aim to do the same but
using a different approach. Choose either one, not both.
When you add WiQuery to the classpath it installs itself using a W
I got answer from Wiquey developer :
"Hi!
JQWicket and WiQuery do not work well together. Both aim to do the same but
using a different approach. Choose either one, not both.
When you add WiQuery to the classpath it installs itself using a Wicket
Initializer and sets a HeaderResponseDeco
Wiquery and JQWicket crash each other
When using Wicket (1.5.3) + JQWicket 8.0 + Wiquery (1.5.3) , the order of
the js libraries will be wrong
1) I've started with:
Wicket (1.5.3) + JQWicket 8.0
*I run the TipTipPage Example ... *
*generated html:*
*Everything work
an Mulholland
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Pointbreak
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I've never used either framework, but your question made me curious
>>>>>> again. (Years ago I evaluated the e
your question made me curious
>>>>> again. (Years ago I evaluated the existing wicket-jquery integrations
>>>>> and wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
>>>>> just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that har
wasn't happy with how they were designed. Since than I've always
>>>> just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
>>>> and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
>>>> being said I just
ed. Since than I've always
>>> just used jquery inside wicket, it's not that hard for simple designs,
>>> and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
>>> being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
>
for simple designs,
>> and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
>> being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
>> that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
>> Accordion Component), while JqWi
ance at the projects again and it seems
>> that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
>> Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
>> (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g. a
>> ListView). The la
hat
> being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
> that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
> Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
> (i.e. you add an AccordionBehavior to an existing Component, e.g.
gns,
and for complex designs these frameworks may be just to rigid). That
being said I just had a quick glance at the projects again and it seems
that WiQuery does the integration via Components (i.e. you create an
Accordion Component), while JqWicket does the integration via Bahaviors
(i.e. you add an
We are considering WiQuery and JQWicket.
1) Which is better and why?
2) Is one more established or better supported than the other?
3) Is one more full featured?
What differentiates the two?
Brian Mulholland
-
To unsubscribe
Hello,
I'm trying to use Wicket(1.5.1) with JQWicket(0.7).
But it does not work together with a locale custom mapper shown in Wicket's
example page.
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/mappers/de_DE
When I access a page where JQWicket components are added through this
custom mapper, no Jav
Hello
I want to migrate from wiquery to jqwicket but I have a problem. In wiquery
I used
add(new HeaderContributor(new CoreJavaScriptHeaderContributor())) in
BasePage to force adding jquery.js first before others js (my_application.js
or jquery plugins).
How can I do this with jqwicket?
Thanks
See http://code.google.com/p/jqwicket/#Quickstart_for_maven_users
googlecode
http://jqwicket.googlecode.com/svn/m2-repo/releases/
com.google.code.jqwicket
jqwicket
0.7
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/maven-repository-for
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> tell us
let us know it too
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Decebal Suiu wrote:
>> Ignore. I found it.
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.n
tell us
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Decebal Suiu wrote:
> Ignore. I found it.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/maven-repository-for-JQWicket-tp3963213p3963258.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list arc
Ignore. I found it.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/maven-repository-for-JQWicket-tp3963213p3963258.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe
Hello
Do you know a public maven repository for JQWicket?
Thanks,
Decebal
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/maven-repository-for-JQWicket-tp3963213p3963213.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Martin Grigorov-4 wrote:
>
>
> Both Wiquery and jqWicket provide integration with JQuery UI, not plain
> JQuery.
> Wicket core may provide some abstractions to make integrations with
> JQuery UI at some later point.
>
>
JQWicket provides much more than only JQ
d a separate
> jqWicket or wiQuery or is the Wicket library only using a small subset
> of jQuery and not intending to expose the entire jQuery API?
Wicket will use JQuery as a backing library for its wicket-ajax.js
initially. This involves - ajax, events, DOM manipulation.
Both Wiquery an
Did I read somewhere recently that Wicket itself was starting to use
some of jQuery directly for some of its js? If the use of jQuery
directly by Wicket were to become more pervasive would that mean we
would not need a separate
jqWicket or wiQuery or is the Wicket library only using a small subset
Hey ..
I've had a hope someone else allready did it .. so that's why I asked.
Regards
Armando
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/jqWicket-or-wiQuery-tp3895432p3897026.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at
; can't
> decide ... both wrap jQuery ui components ...
> first use case i have is to create date range picker wicket component.
>
> regards
>
> Armando
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/jqWicket-or-wiQuery-tp38954
43 matches
Mail list logo
