; >add(check);
> >> >> >add(label);
> >> >> >}
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
gt;> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Usually, checkModel would be null as the goal would be to use
>> >> > compoundPropertyModel on the checkBox..My question is, is it
>> possible
>> to
>> >> > achieve this ? Or should I be disca
Thanks for the replies.
CPM has been working fine for me. Although what Martin says is true, I've
been reducing that in my CPM's by means of public static final variables on
the bean's classes. Just fields with the name of fields (sort of class
meta-info). Then using those fields as wicket:id's...
> so you where talking about property models in general (not the compound)
>
> We have a solution for that now
No. Property models can use constants or "the new solution". But there
is no solution for compound property models, yet. Unless someone knows
how to make the compiler chew html wicket:id'
so you where talking about property models in general (not the compound)
We have a solution for that now
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:25, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> Yes, but it ties your beans to wicket ids. More refactoring and
> maintenance work.
>
> Anyways, i
Yes, but it ties your beans to wicket ids. More refactoring and
maintenance work.
Anyways, if it works for you, use it.
my 2cents
**
Martin
2009/12/15 Johan Compagner :
> why not
> it kills a lot of code.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:45, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com
why not
it kills a lot of code.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:45, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't use CPM for anything serious anyways...
>
> my 2cents
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2009/12/14 Xavier López :
> > Hi,
> >
> > In my application I have a number of fields
I wouldn't use CPM for anything serious anyways...
my 2cents
**
Martin
2009/12/14 Xavier López :
> Hi,
>
> In my application I have a number of fields that allow validation, by means
> of a validation CheckBox. In order to provide some flexibility for this kind
> of validation fields, I'd like t
Hi,
In my application I have a number of fields that allow validation, by means
of a validation CheckBox. In order to provide some flexibility for this kind
of validation fields, I'd like to have them implemented in a Component (i.e.
ValidationTickPanel), so that they provide their own markup and
