Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2010-01-15 Thread morbo
Sorry for jumping into this issue again, but I am still a bit confused. I need a definitive answer for this as I have to document it in my diploma thesis. In my app I have a requirement that a new page has to be opened in a popup window, which is pretty easy with wicket using the popupsettings o

RE: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-27 Thread Ames, Tim
et="_blank" and physically opening a new window using the browser can get different results. -Original Message- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:igor.vaynb...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 2:50 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Questions about Wicket sessions On Su

Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-27 Thread Martijn Dashorst
>> So if I dont use clustered web servers, custom methods on a custom session >> object do not need be "synchronized". Put it another way, Wicket session is >> thread-safe in case of a single web server. Correct? >> >> Cheers. >> >> >> --- On Sun,

Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-27 Thread Erik van Oosten
Igor Vaynberg wrote: 2. If I start IE or FF in another window, visitor activities on the same Wicket app are considered in the same or different session? always a different sessions, browsers do not share sessions. I think it depends on what David meant by 'another window'. I assumed

Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-26 Thread David Chang
Igor, thank you for the correction. Really appreciated. Thanks! --- On Sun, 7/26/09, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > From: Igor Vaynberg > Subject: Re: Questions about Wicket sessions > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 4:23 PM > no, incorrect. multiple browse

Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
ustom methods on a custom session > object do not need be "synchronized". Put it another way, Wicket session is > thread-safe in case of a single web server. Correct? > > Cheers. > > > --- On Sun, 7/26/09, Erik van Oosten wrote: > >> From: Erik van Oosten >&

Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-26 Thread David Chang
an Oosten wrote: > From: Erik van Oosten > Subject: Re: Questions about Wicket sessions > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 2:08 PM > David, > > Please note "Sessions are not thread-safe" in Wicket > context means that the Session /object

Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:53 AM, David Chang wrote: > 1. If I open another tab on the same browser (IE or FF), visitor activities > on the same Wicket app are considered in the same session? same session, this is why we provide browser auto-multiwindow support, so we can detect a new tab/window b

Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-26 Thread Erik van Oosten
David, Please note "Sessions are not thread-safe" in Wicket context means that the Session /object/ is not thread-safe. Note that requests that fall within a session (except for resources) are handled serially. Only when you use session clustering this guarantee can not be made. 1. It depend

Re: Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-26 Thread David Chang
Chang wrote: > From: David Chang > Subject: Questions about Wicket sessions > To: users@wicket.apache.org > Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 11:53 AM > > > > Reading <> to learn Wicket, I > understand that sessions are not thread-safe. I have the > following questi

Questions about Wicket sessions

2009-07-26 Thread David Chang
Reading <> to learn Wicket, I understand that sessions are not thread-safe. I have the following questions about a Wicket app: 1. If I open another tab on the same browser (IE or FF), visitor activities on the same Wicket app are considered in the same session? 2. If I start IE or FF in anot