> However, could I use the circle image between 'Apache' and 'Wicket'? Only the
> simbol mark, which
> do not include the word 'Apache Wicket' and 'example'?
Oh, sorry. You already have answered this question on your first post...
> If you want to go forward quickly, you could use the design,
OK, I understand that.
We will not use the logo on our website, but only the design.
However, could I use the circle image between 'Apache' and 'Wicket'? Only the
simbol mark, which
do not include the word 'Apache Wicket' and 'example'?
-
Tsutomu YANO
mailto:b
On 1/23/08, Tsutomu Yano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I understand that the the name "Apache Wicket" may be under a kind of
> protection. So We
> will wait your answer about the WICKET logo.
The answer was drumrol silence.
This means that the way I suggested things didn't trigger a n
Hi,
Thank you for your quick response.
I understand that the the name "Apache Wicket" may be under a kind of
protection. So We
will wait your answer about the WICKET logo.
However we now need to start preparing our site quickly, so we will use the
design of
wicket-example on our pages. only t
On 1/21/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/21/08, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Oh and by the way I noticed a poll on the Spring front page:
> > http://www.springframework.org/ that asks the question "which web
> > templating
> > framework do you use" and Wic
On 1/21/08, Peter Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oh and by the way I noticed a poll on the Spring front page:
> http://www.springframework.org/ that asks the question "which web
> templating
> framework do you use" and Wicket is one of the choices :)
>
And of course the poll is rather skewe
Actually, "Wicket" as it pertains to Apache Wicket is protected. I'm just
not sure to what extent. It may even be that new open source projects many
not call them "WicketFoo", but rather "Foo for Apache Wicket". It all has to
do with protecting the trademark.
However, I'm still waiting for a reply
On 1/21/08, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cool to hear that it is such a big success!
>
> I cant believe that you couldnt use those things if they are all also
> released under apache license but lets wait for martijn. (you could
> drop the apache form the apache wicket name)
Can
Cool to hear that it is such a big success!
I cant believe that you couldnt use those things if they are all also
released under apache license but lets wait for martijn. (you could
drop the apache form the apache wicket name)
On 1/20/08, Tsutomu Yano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Few
Hi,
It is great to hear that Wicket is popular in Japan!
With your questions you ask some difficult ones :)
I'll forward your question to the appropriate people within the Apache
foundation. It will take some time to get an answer back.
So this is not a no or a yes answer, but a "wait for an ans
Hi,
Few days ago, we (I and my friends) organize a user group of Wicket
in Japan("Wicket User Group Japan" aka "Wicket-JA") and already 80+
people join with us.
https://sourceforge.jp/projects/wicket-ja
We are creating the group-site now (we haven't it yet. only mailing
lists).
Th
11 matches
Mail list logo
