Re: Questions regarding Wicket 8 and lambda expressions for models

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6379 Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Sven Meier wrote: > Hi, > > WDYT ? Do we need to implement #detach() in #map(), #filter(), etc ? >> > > yes, I

Re: Questions regarding Wicket 8 and lambda expressions for models

Hi, WDYT ? Do we need to implement #detach() in #map(), #filter(), etc ? yes, I think this is a good idea: the returned model holds a reference to the given model, so it should detach it. Regards Sven On 24.05.2017 21:36, Martin Grigorov wrote: On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Martin

Re: Questions regarding Wicket 8 and lambda expressions for models

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Ihmehlmenn wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> while trying out some of the very cool new features in Wicket 8, >> specifically replacing PropertyModels

Re: Questions regarding Wicket 8 and lambda expressions for models

tants.MY_STATIC_VALUE; > Correct! The static constant won't be serialized but the closure will be. So this version should be close memory-wise to using AbstractReadOnlyModel for this use case but anonymous inner classes have a reference to the outer instance and afaik lambdas don't have it.

Questions regarding Wicket 8 and lambda expressions for models

42946.n4.nabble.com/Questions-regarding-Wicket-8-and-lambda-expressions-for-models-tp4677918.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org F