By the way Wicket is growing and changing i thought that the book would never
been finished as one chapter was probably done, another would have to be
refactored to keep it up to date with the API. Actually the only time when i
had to rewrite code for switching to another version was from 1.2 to 1
> I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in Action.
Hi Ned,
I'm afraid not, because we are right now finalizing the book and we
still have to start working on 1.4. I would also mean weeks of extra
work for us, and after more than 2 years of writing, we've had it :-)
T
Yeah for 2.0 they can make a new revision 'wicket in action 2'
On 3/23/08, Ned Collyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heh, nah :) the book is great so far.
>
> I know generics is pretty much just a syntactic nicety, so it doesn't matter
> one way or the other.
>
> Perhaps a good way to sell a sequ
Heh, nah :) the book is great so far.
I know generics is pretty much just a syntactic nicety, so it doesn't matter
one way or the other.
Perhaps a good way to sell a sequel ;)
"C." Bergström wrote:
>
> You must want Martijn or Eelco to really hurt you huh? ;)
>
> I just want to congratulate
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 16:01 -0700, Ned Collyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just curious if the move to 1.4 will have an impact on Wicket in Action.
>
> It would be great if when it's released in paper form, that examples match
> the current version version of wicket. I can imagine it would be a huge
>
