nuary 14, 2008 2:22 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Type safe roles for AUTH-ROLES?
In my opinion there is nothing 'wrong' with auth-roles. but they are
limited in scope. Fortunately the code base is really small so it
wouldn't take that much effort to roll your own based
55 PM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Type safe roles for AUTH-ROLES?
>
> heh. it is a functional example of a fully implemented authorization
> strategy. but it doesnt have any fancy features, nor will they be
> added to it in the future. it is meant to serve as an e
]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:15 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Type safe roles for AUTH-ROLES?
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 13:51 -0800, Dan Kaplan wrote:
> What? Really? F***. Can you please elaborate? Did I waste every second
> of the time I spent looking at the examples on wi
for a comparison between auth-roles and swarm/wasp, take a look at
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Security+Framework+Comparison
gerolf
On Jan 14, 2008 11:14 PM, C. Bergström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 13:51 -0800, Dan Kaplan wrote:
> > What? Real
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 13:51 -0800, Dan Kaplan wrote:
> What? Really? F***. Can you please elaborate? Did I waste every second
> of the time I spent looking at the examples on wicketstuff? I applied these
> examples to my webapp. Did I implement some type of "pretend" authorization
> strategy
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:55 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Type safe roles for AUTH-ROLES?
heh. it is a functional example of a fully implemented authorization
strategy. but it doesnt have any fancy fea
nt some type of "pretend" authorization
> strategy?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:31 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Type safe roles for AUTH-ROL
rg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 10:31 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Type safe roles for AUTH-ROLES?
wicket-auth-roles is just an example. its not really meant to be
something you drop into your application, for that there is
wicketstuf
wicket-auth-roles is just an example. its not really meant to be
something you drop into your application, for that there is
wicketstuff-wasp and wicketstuff-swarm
-igor
On Jan 12, 2008 9:14 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have several successful Wicket projects going, and in
I have several successful Wicket projects going, and in all have used my own
authorization strategy based on annotations. I'm just trying
wicket-auth-roles for my next project, but seem confused by the apparent
String-only roles. I already have a domain model where a User has a Role or
Role(s), w
10 matches
Mail list logo
