Re: Wicket Components as Class Members

2013-11-12 Thread mashleyttu
Thank you everyone for your replies. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Components-as-Class-Members-tp4662235p4662345.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Wicket Components as Class Members

2013-11-09 Thread Bas Gooren
bles in your classes sparingly. source: http://wickettraining.com/ten-things-every-wicket-programmer-should-know.html -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Components-as-Class-Members-tp4662235p4662237.html Sent from the Users

Re: Wicket Components as Class Members

2013-11-08 Thread Sven Meier
would sure make it easier to access later on. I really feel like an idiot asking this question, just concerned about session size. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Components-as-Class-Members-tp4662235.html Sent from the Users foru

Re: Wicket Components as Class Members

2013-11-08 Thread meduolis
utious with what you reference within anonymous inner classes and use member variables in your classes sparingly. source: http://wickettraining.com/ten-things-every-wicket-programmer-should-know.html -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Compone

Wicket Components as Class Members

2013-11-08 Thread mashleyttu
nent final or a class member when declaring it? It would sure make it easier to access later on. I really feel like an idiot asking this question, just concerned about session size. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-Components-as-Class-Members