Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-11 Thread Ryan Crumley
I have (I am using MixedParamHybridUrlCodingStrategy) however in this case the browser is not contacting the server on back button click so the UrlCodingStrategy does not come into play. Ryan On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, mzem...@osc.state.ny.us wrote: I've had similar issues, have you tried

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-11 Thread Pointbreak
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-923 for a solution. On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:31 -0500, Ryan Crumley crum...@gmail.com wrote: I have (I am using MixedParamHybridUrlCodingStrategy) however in this case the browser is not contacting the server on back button click so the

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-06 Thread MZemeck
I've had similar issues, have you tried HybridUrlCodingStrategy? Notice: This communication, including any attachments, is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is protected from disclosure under

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-03 Thread Ryan Crumley
What is interesting is this is not a wicket specific issue however it is more serious when using wicket than other frameworks due to the expired links causing errors when they reappear. I created a very simple version of the problem. Chrome and IE8 exhibits the problem but Firefox and Safari do

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-03 Thread Zilvinas Vilutis
Yes, it is not repeatable on FF because FF does page caching which IE does not for Back history. Your page must be stateless on the server side. Žilvinas Vilutis Mobile:   (+370) 652 38353 E-mail:   cika...@gmail.com On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Ryan Crumley crum...@gmail.com wrote: What

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-03 Thread Ryan Crumley
Just to clarify: The page in the example link I sent is stateless (it's static html). The other point is that Chrome and IE do not fetch the original page on back button click. They are serving the original html straight from the cache (without the DOM modifications). It sounds like the only fix

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-09-24 Thread Peter Karich
I had the same problem ... Take a look at http://www.richardnichols.net/2010/03/apache-wicket-force-page-reload-to-fix-ajax-back/ isn't there a better fix? E.g. it seems to me that this 'hack' avoids client-side js caching (or is this a wrong observation)? Regards, Peter. --

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-09-23 Thread Richard Nichols
Take a look at http://www.richardnichols.net/2010/03/apache-wicket-force-page-reload-to-fix-ajax-back/ On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Ryan Crumley crum...@gmail.com wrote: All, I ran into strange behavior involving wicket ajax updates + chrome + back button. I am pretty sure the issue is

chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-09-21 Thread Ryan Crumley
All, I ran into strange behavior involving wicket ajax updates + chrome + back button. I am pretty sure the issue is not caused by wicket but I am hoping the problem might sound familiar to someone and they can point me in the right direction. The scenario goes like this: - An ajax request is