en using. No XML, all POJO.
-Original Message-
From: Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:28 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: have anyone tried empire-DB?
So have you tried it with wicket?
http://incubator.apache.org/emp
ing. No XML, all POJO.
-Original Message-
From: Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:28 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: have anyone tried empire-DB?
So have you tried it with wicket?
http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/
-
e recommends?
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/have-anyone-tried-empire-DB--tp20016534p20129739.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
ages and I don't "love" either. I would
> rather
> >> not
> >> >>> have to care about tables, objects,the mighty mismatch (and in
> >> Hibernate's
> >> >>> case the mighty session) anymore, but just shove that damn
ty session) anymore, but just shove that damn thing into
>> an
>> >>> object database ;)
>> >>>
>> >>> *hides from enraged DBAs and their optimised queries*
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>> *hides from enraged DBAs and their optimised queries*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nino.Martinez wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Yeah seems to be nice...
> >>>>
> >>>> At WUG DK
t if using stuff like hibernate, for simple
>>>> cruds it's nice but if you have a complex object graph it becomes very
>>>> troublesome to use (if you use cascade all etc.)..
>>>>
>>>> Ames, Tim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>
e hibernate, for simple
>>> cruds it's nice but if you have a complex object graph it becomes very
>>> troublesome to use (if you use cascade all etc.)..
>>>
>>> Ames, Tim wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Looks like it has a lot in common with
Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:28 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: have anyone tried empire-DB?
So have you tried it with wicket?
http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @
IL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:28 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: have anyone tried empire-DB?
So have you tried it with wicket?
http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Sp
> been using. No XML, all POJO.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:28 AM
>> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>> Subject: have anyone tried empire-DB?
&
That is what I have been
using. No XML, all POJO.
-Original Message-
From: Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:28 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: have anyone tried empire-DB?
So have you tried it with wicket?
Looks like it has a lot in common with JPersist. That is what I have been
using. No XML, all POJO.
-Original Message-
From: Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 11:28 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: have anyone tried
So have you tried it with wicket?
http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
14 matches
Mail list logo