Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Fabio Mancinelli
Maybe I am late... Anyway +1 for 4A. -Fabio On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > VOTING: > > You can send your vote on the mailing list (d...@xwiki.org or > users@xwiki.org), in reply to this email. No twitter votes this time. > > Each voter can grant a whole +1 to only one o

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Guillaume Lerouge
Hi, On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > > +1 for 4A > > and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing > arm.. > I can't read XWiki in it.. > I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovic's feeling. I had people from outside the project

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Vincent Massol
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > >> >> +1 for 4A >> >> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing >> arm.. >> I can't read XWiki in it.. >> > > I'd like to react about this:

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
On 04/13/2010 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > >> >> +1 for 4A >> >> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing >> arm.. >> I can't read XWiki in it.. >> > > I'd like to react about this: at this stage

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Fabio Mancinelli
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > >> >> +1 for 4A >> >> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing >> arm.. >> I can't read XWiki in it.. >> > > I'd like to react about this:

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Ecaterina Valica
Hi, I think version 16 is the ONLY original logo we have for this challenge. It is abstract enough to make a great brand and be reused for variations. It is simple, straightforward and easily to remember (not to reproduce, to remember that you've seen it before). It's look IMO is perfect for a tec

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Ecaterina Valica
Btw, logos are graphical marks and is not mandatory that they are logotypes (wordmarks). This means you don't necessarily need to read the name of the product from the start (look at apple, volkswagen, audi, sun, etc). After you know it's XWiki, you can easily see what proposal 16 states. The logo

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Vincent Massol
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote: > Btw, logos are graphical marks and is not mandatory that they are logotypes > (wordmarks). This means you don't necessarily need to read the name of the > product from the start (look at apple, volkswagen, audi, sun, etc). After > you know i

[xwiki-users] no results for "mange list of watched sites"

2010-04-13 Thread axel.at
hello, I'm using xwiki XWIKI ENTERPRISE 2.2.2.27483 when I click at username-menu "mange list of watched sites" (url=http://xwiki.domain.com/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/Admin?category=watchlist) (eg logged in as admin) I get the standard user site (same as http://xwiki.domain.net/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/Ad

Re: [xwiki-users] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
I've been analyzing the proposed logos, gathered feedback, read logo design articles, and here's what I think so far. A logo should be rather abstract than metaphoric. Trying to say too much in a logo makes a bad logo. Most famous examples are very simple, and say nothing about what the brand d

Re: [xwiki-users] no results for "mange list of watched sites"

2010-04-13 Thread Sergiu Dumitriu
On 04/13/2010 01:47 PM, axel.at wrote: > there is another problem with: > document index search (http://xwiki.domain.net/xwiki/bin/view/Main/AllDocs): > I'l never get any results > > debugging with firebug shows that the ajax request looks like this: > http://xwiki.domain.net/xwiki/bin/get/XWiki/Li

Re: [xwiki-users] no results for "mange list of watched sites"

2010-04-13 Thread Axel at
2010/4/13 Sergiu Dumitriu > On 04/13/2010 01:47 PM, axel.at wrote: > > there is another problem with: > > document index search ( > http://xwiki.domain.net/xwiki/bin/view/Main/AllDocs): > > I'l never get any results > > > > debugging with firebug shows that the ajax request looks like this: > > >

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-13 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
Hi all, Guillaume Lerouge wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > >> +1 for 4A >> >> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing >> arm.. >> I can't read XWiki in it.. >> > > I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovi

[xwiki-users] TWiki Syntax HTML

2010-04-13 Thread Meng Wu
Hey all, The TWiki syntax doesn't seem to fully support HTML elements like , , , and links (they aren't rendered at all or rendered incorrectly). However, basic syntax minus these tags such as , bullets, etc, work. Enabling these HTML elements is essential because we are migrating documents fr