Maybe I am late... Anyway
+1 for 4A.
-Fabio
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> VOTING:
>
> You can send your vote on the mailing list (d...@xwiki.org or
> users@xwiki.org), in reply to this email. No twitter votes this time.
>
> Each voter can grant a whole +1 to only one o
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>
> +1 for 4A
>
> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
> arm..
> I can't read XWiki in it..
>
I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovic's feeling. I had
people from outside the project
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>
>>
>> +1 for 4A
>>
>> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
>> arm..
>> I can't read XWiki in it..
>>
>
> I'd like to react about this:
On 04/13/2010 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>
>>
>> +1 for 4A
>>
>> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
>> arm..
>> I can't read XWiki in it..
>>
>
> I'd like to react about this: at this stage
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>
>>
>> +1 for 4A
>>
>> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
>> arm..
>> I can't read XWiki in it..
>>
>
> I'd like to react about this:
Hi,
I think version 16 is the ONLY original logo we have for this challenge.
It is abstract enough to make a great brand and be reused for variations.
It is simple, straightforward and easily to remember (not to reproduce, to
remember that you've seen it before).
It's look IMO is perfect for a tec
Btw, logos are graphical marks and is not mandatory that they are logotypes
(wordmarks). This means you don't necessarily need to read the name of the
product from the start (look at apple, volkswagen, audi, sun, etc). After
you know it's XWiki, you can easily see what proposal 16 states.
The logo
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Ecaterina Valica wrote:
> Btw, logos are graphical marks and is not mandatory that they are logotypes
> (wordmarks). This means you don't necessarily need to read the name of the
> product from the start (look at apple, volkswagen, audi, sun, etc). After
> you know i
hello,
I'm using xwiki XWIKI ENTERPRISE 2.2.2.27483
when I click at username-menu "mange list of watched sites"
(url=http://xwiki.domain.com/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/Admin?category=watchlist)
(eg logged in as admin)
I get the standard user site (same as
http://xwiki.domain.net/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/Ad
I've been analyzing the proposed logos, gathered feedback, read logo
design articles, and here's what I think so far.
A logo should be rather abstract than metaphoric. Trying to say too much
in a logo makes a bad logo. Most famous examples are very simple, and
say nothing about what the brand d
On 04/13/2010 01:47 PM, axel.at wrote:
> there is another problem with:
> document index search (http://xwiki.domain.net/xwiki/bin/view/Main/AllDocs):
> I'l never get any results
>
> debugging with firebug shows that the ajax request looks like this:
> http://xwiki.domain.net/xwiki/bin/get/XWiki/Li
2010/4/13 Sergiu Dumitriu
> On 04/13/2010 01:47 PM, axel.at wrote:
> > there is another problem with:
> > document index search (
> http://xwiki.domain.net/xwiki/bin/view/Main/AllDocs):
> > I'l never get any results
> >
> > debugging with firebug shows that the ajax request looks like this:
> >
>
Hi all,
Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>
>> +1 for 4A
>>
>> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
>> arm..
>> I can't read XWiki in it..
>>
>
> I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovi
Hey all,
The TWiki syntax doesn't seem to fully support HTML elements like , ,
, and links (they aren't rendered at all or rendered incorrectly).
However, basic syntax minus these tags such as , bullets, etc, work.
Enabling these HTML elements is essential because we are migrating documents
fr
14 matches
Mail list logo