Hi Anca,
On Dec 15, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Anca Luca wrote:
Hi Vincent,
It sounds pretty good to me.
There are a few items we need to make sure we implement right (making it
clear
what's commercial and what's open on xwiki.org, the 'rules' for getting the
offer listed, etc), but those are
On Dec 15, 2009, at 9:22 PM, Pascal Voitot wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if pascal is me or someone else but I'm also one Pascal so I
answer ;)
Sorry for the long mail...
I agree with this kind of governance as long as XWiki.org keeps fully free
and brings the best and latest code with
On Dec 16, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
On Dec 4, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Governance Proposal
=
1) xwiki.org is controlled by the XWiki committers. This means that
important changes brought to it should be discussed/vote on the list,
On Dec 4, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Governance Proposal
=
1) xwiki.org is controlled by the XWiki committers. This means that
important changes brought to it should be discussed/vote on the list,
using the same practices as for code commits
+1
2)
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi everyone (devs and users),
While we have a clear governance for write access to our source
repository (http://dev.xwiki.org), we're missing a clear governance
for xwiki.org. The idea is to address mainly the
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 15:44, Vincent Massol vinc...@massol.net wrote:
Hi everyone (devs and users),
While we have a clear governance for write access to our source
repository (http://dev.xwiki.org), we're missing a clear governance
for xwiki.org. The idea is to address mainly the following 2
Hi Pascal,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Pascal Voitot
pascal.voitot@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I don't know if pascal is me or someone else but I'm also one Pascal so I
answer ;)
Yes, I meant you :-)
Sorry for the long mail...
Thanks for the detailed feedback!
I agree with this
