Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

yes,I think the Admin feature is necessary! On 2017-03-20 12:03 (+0800), Jongyoul Lee wrote: > Hi dev & users, > > Recently, community submits very new features for Apache Zeppelin. I think > it's very positive signals to improve Apache Zeppelin and its community. > But in

unsubscribe

Re: How to let Zeppelin have map visulization function

This is fairly easy to follow along and get working. https://gist.github.com/granturing/a09aed4a302a7367be92 On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:15 PM, mingda li wrote: > Oh, I see. Thanks. > Could someone help to publish the map visualization to npm? > > Bests, > Mingda > > On

Re: Auto completion for defined variable names

Hi, Thanks for reporting the problem. Although some interpreter implements auto-completions, overall experience on auto-completion is something that Zeppelin need to improve. If you can file some JIRA issues, that will encourage code contributions. Thanks, moon On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:51 AM

Re: Pyspark failing in 0.7.0

Hi Ahyoung , Here are logs messages. * zeppelin-zeppelin-usw2dxdpgw01.local.log* INFO [2017-03-21 18:00:06,601] ({qtp1566723494-91} NotebookServer.java[broadcastNewParagraph]:640) - Broadcasting paragraph on run call instead of note. INFO [2017-03-21 18:00:06,687] ({pool-2-thread-25}

Re: How to let Zeppelin have map visulization function

Pluggable module list(Helium) on website list user package (3rd party) in npm registry. Each plugin can have it's own license which may/may not compatible to Apache 2 License, while zeppelin is not including them in the release. So, accepting the plugin license is up to individual user when

Re: How to let Zeppelin have map visulization function

Dear moon, Is the https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/765/files the right one? On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:04 AM, mingda li wrote: > Dear moon, > Thanks for your explain. But I don't find map visualization in the > pluggable list. > What is the map visualization

Re: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

Thanks for the opinion. Yes we can think about proper label. These are labels mentioned in this threads so far. 'Unstable', 'Stable', 'Old' 'Latest', 'Stable', 'Old' 'Beta', 'Stable', 'Old' Intention is not that we want to release 'unstable' version, i think. The intention is give user proper

Aw: Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

Hi moon, I think assuming the latest release would be unstable is confusing and not in line with other Apache projects. If you want to have a instable prerelease version, I would suggest to call it a beta version and once the major bugs are removed, a new stable release could be provided. BR,

Re: How to let Zeppelin have map visulization function

Dear moon, Thanks for your explain. But I don't find map visualization in the pluggable list. What is the map visualization without license issue? Is it this one https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/765/files? Or you can provide me your link. If I pull from that one to my source tree, do I need

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

And if i suggest simplest way for us to set quality expectation to user, which will be labeling release in download page. Currently releases are divided into 2 categories in download page. 'Latest release' and 'Old releases'. I think we can treat 'Latest' as unstable and add one more category

Re: How to let Zeppelin have map visulization function

Hi Mingda, Zeppelin had map visualization once in it's source tree, but unfortunately it's removed because of license issue[1]. Of course we can try find another map visualization without license issue to embed it in the source tree. Or there's another way. Visualization became pluggable since

Re: Pyspark failing in 0.7.0

Hi Anand, Can you share your log files in here? You can find them under ZEPPELIN_HOME/logs/ Thanks Ahyoung On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Anandha L Ranganathan < analog.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > zeppelin : 0.7.0 > Spark : 1.6.0 (HDP 2.4) > > > *Command in the notebook* > > %pyspark > 2+2

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

I agree that it will help prolong RC period and use it actually. And also we need code freeze for the new features and spend time to stabilize RC. On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 on quality and stabilization. > > I'm not sure if releasing as

How to let Zeppelin have map visulization function

Dear all, Now, I wan to let Zeppelin 0.7.0 and 0.6.0 support the map visualization. Is that function support by the official version? Or we need to do something like here https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/152 https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/765 Thanks, Mingda

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

+1 on quality and stabilization. I'm not sure if releasing as preview or calling it unstable fits with the ASF release process though. Other projects have code freeze, RC (and longer RC iteration time) etc. - do we think those will help improve quality when the release is finally cut?