Where there be any plans for allowing IronPython to work with an
instance of CPython directly? There are quite a few instances where
this would be extremely handy (SWIG-wrapped libraries such as
wxPython, or tightly optimized pieces that deal directly with
operating system concepts such as Twisted
So that shows consumption -- is creation supported?
Very cool
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jim Hugunin
Sent: Fri 4/1/2005 5:17 PM
To: Martin Smith; users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: RE: [IronPython] Generics support in IronPython
Mart
Martin Smith wrote:
> Will IronPython support generics?
Here's the short answer to your question:
>>> from System.Collections.Generic import *
>>> l = List[str]()
>>> l.Add('hi')
>>> list(l)
['hi']
>>> l.Add(42)
System.Exception: bad args to this method
This works today and creates a List. All
Writing the IDE plug-in for Visual Studio or SharpDevelop might be more
beneficial to IronPython if the plugin is written in IronPython (!). The
Boo plug-in for SharpDevelop exposed a few bugs in Boo that nobody had
really noticed before, which was convient, to say the least.
Not that I'm volun
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:04:45AM +0200, R.R. Sprinkhuizen wrote:
>
> > If you liked it better with the old license and old requirements, fork the
> old one.
>
> If I had that kind of programming capabilities, I wouldn't be here whining
> about 2.0, now would I?
So put up some money to have som
> If you liked it better with the old license and old requirements, fork the
old one.
If I had that kind of programming capabilities, I wouldn't be here whining
about 2.0, now would I?
Cheers!
Reginald
___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ir
On Apr 1, 2005, at 15:31, R.R. Sprinkhuizen wrote:
I guess you're right: by the time IronPython (or whatever the name
will be)
is production ready, everybody will have 2.0 on their machine. Right? I
guess it's just another Microsoft way of saying: you must upgrade to
2.0. I
don't like that tone.
I guess you're right: by the time IronPython (or whatever the name will be)
is production ready, everybody will have 2.0 on their machine. Right? I
guess it's just another Microsoft way of saying: you must upgrade to 2.0. I
don't like that tone. I like Python, I like the addition of .NET and I like
"Terry L. Triplett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Microsoft + fear of OSS + shared source = shython
Sounds somewhat like the german 'scheissen'.
___
users-ironpython.com mailing list
users-ironpython.com@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com
I take back my vote for ipython and throw my entire one vote behind nython...
"Programming in Nython" ...
Anthony
On Apr 1, 2005 6:17 PM, Terry L. Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2005 05:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Jim Hugunin wrote:
> > > Thanks for the feedback o
On Friday 01 April 2005 05:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Hugunin wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that
> > there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
> >
> > The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy.
Not to contribu
Jim Hugunin wrote:
Thanks for the feedback on names for IronPythonConsole. I notice that
there were zero votes for keeping the name as is .
The two names that had votes in favor of them were fepy and ironpy.
ironpy is very like irony, so maybe pirony would be better?
More seriously how about piron
Hi,
Will IronPython support generics?
Also, is support for calling python code from other CLR languages scoped for
1.0? It would be a particularly useful to be able to call compiled python
code from C#, or, even better, extend python classes in C#.
Keep up the great work. I'm looking forward t
13 matches
Mail list logo
