RE: [IronPython] Renaming IronPythonConsole

2005-04-02 Thread J. Merrill
I don't know why you're whining about it anyway. 2.0 is faster and better, and (unlike previous technologies inflicted upon us by MS) it won't cause any trouble to have both 2.0 and earlier versions on the same machine at the same time. At 05:04 PM 4/1/2005, R.R. Sprinkhuizen wrote >> If you

[IronPython] Re: users-ironpython.com Digest, Vol 9, Issue 2

2005-04-02 Thread Randall Burns
My related question: what would it take to make Python full featured enough that it really could be used for a compiler project like this? --- Timothy Fitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > As a sidenote, I believe the compiler was originally > prototyped in python, why was C# chosen as a > language

RE: [IronPython] Re: IronPython 0.7.1 released

2005-04-02 Thread Martin Maly
Thanks for all the bug reports, Michael. As for the compatibility, when in doubt on specific issues, I consult Python 2.4 myself so that is what I personally compare our implementation against at the moment. Test suite ... we do already have a test suite to test basic functionality and regression

[IronPython] Re: Missing builtins

2005-04-02 Thread Michael Spencer
Joe Mason wrote: On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:24:03PM -0800, Michael Spencer wrote: Here is the set of built-ins that 2.3.3 has and that fepy 0.7.1 lacks. Absence from this list does not mean an object is correctly implemented. Is this list exhaustive, or only what you've noticed so far? Joe It is

Re: [IronPython] Missing builtins

2005-04-02 Thread Joe Mason
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:24:03PM -0800, Michael Spencer wrote: > Here is the set of built-ins that 2.3.3 has and that fepy 0.7.1 lacks. > Absence from this list does not mean an object is correctly implemented. Is this list exhaustive, or only what you've noticed so far? Joe _

[IronPython] Missing builtins

2005-04-02 Thread Michael Spencer
Here is the set of built-ins that 2.3.3 has and that fepy 0.7.1 lacks. Absence from this list does not mean an object is correctly implemented. Functions: callable (reported as bug) locals (reported as bug) vars __import__ input reload raw_input Types: file buffer Deprecated coerce Run

[IronPython] Re: IronPython 0.7.1 released

2005-04-02 Thread Michael Spencer
Martin Maly wrote: We are excited to announce the release of IronPython 0.7.1. The improvements over the recent 0.7 release are mostly bug fixes for bugs reported by the community and suggestions from the mailing lists and message boards: Thanks for the new release (on schedule!). I have submitte

[IronPython] IronPython 0.7.1 released

2005-04-02 Thread Martin Maly
We are excited to announce the release of IronPython 0.7.1. The improvements over the recent 0.7 release are mostly bug fixes for bugs reported by the community and suggestions from the mailing lists and message boards: * Slicing operator parsing and runtime implementation * Descending sequences